The data shows that incidents are not decreasing at the rate we would expect, which means there is still a gap between compliance on paper and what happens on site.
An-Lie Mostert, Trade Manager at the IWH.
Historically, training was largely governed by TETA. Now, there is a clear transition towards QCTO-accredited programmes, and companies need to prepare for that shift well in advance.
Brian Randall, CEO of the IWH.
The Construction Regulations remain fundamental, but the expectations around how they are implemented have increased significantly.
and the use of trained supervisors.
The cost of complacency Despite regulatory progress, falls from height remain a leading cause of workplace incidents. Statistics from the Federated Employers Mutual (FEM) underline the scale of the issue. Falls onto different levels accounted for over 10% of accidents in 2024, with hundreds of incidents recorded annually and multiple fatalities each year. Even falls on the same level, often underestimated, continue to contribute significantly to lost workdays and financial costs. “These figures highlight why enforcement authorities continue to prioritise fall-related hazards,” says An-Lie Mostert. “The data shows that incidents are not decreasing at the rate we would expect, which means there is still a gap between compliance on paper and what happens on site.” The financial implications are equally stark, with average costs per accident reaching well over R150 000 in some cases. Beyond the numbers, the human cost remains the most pressing concern. From compliance to competence One of the most significant shifts in the regulatory environment is the move towards demonstrable competence rather than simple box-ticking.
Falls onto different levels accounted for over 10% of accidents in 2024, with hundreds of incidents recorded annually and multiple fatalities each year.
IWS is advocating for a system where workers are registered, assessed, and re-licensed periodically.
Despite clear regulatory requirements, the IWH continues to observe recurring compliance gaps across the industry.
“Legally, the requirement is for a ‘competent person’, not a specific certificate,” explains Kriel. “However, in practice, competence must be proven through structured training, assessment, and ongoing development.” The November 2024 amendment to the Driven Machinery Regulations marks a turning point in this regard. Training providers for lifting machines, including mobile elevating work
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NEWS APRIL 2026 13
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker