NIGC Regulatory Updates Since the completion of the NIGC’s Series A, B, and C Tribal consultations held between July 12, 2021, and February 11, 2022, there have been several final rules published in the Federal Register that amend regulations governing various aspects of tribal gaming. Further, two proposed rules have been published in the Federal Register that, if formally promulgated, would amend additional regulations governing various aspects of tribal gaming. Facility License Notification Submission Requirements On July 25, 2022, the NIGC published a final rule amending 25 C.F.R. § 559.2(b) to eliminate the requirement to include certain information about a gaming facility when submitting a Facility License Notification to the NIGC Chair. Specifically, the final rule changes the requirement so that the name and address of the proposed gaming facility be included only if known when the facility license notification is submitted to the NIGC Chair. This final rule was initially proposed on December 1, 2021, with an initial comment period that ended on January 3, 2022, which was subsequently re-opened until June 23, 2022. This final rule became effective on August 24, 2022. Background Investigations and Gaming Licenses for Primary Management Officials and Key Employees On August 10, 2022, the NIGC published a proposed rule that would amend the NIGC’s regulations governing background investigations and the issuance of gaming licenses to Primary Management Officials (“PMOs”) and Key Employees (“KEs”) in 25 C.F.R. Parts 502, 556, and 558. Comments to this proposed rule were due September 9, 2022. Specifically, this proposed rule, if promulgated, would amend the NIGC’s regulations by: 1) amending the definition of a KE in § 502.14 to include any person authorized by the gaming operation for unescorted access to restricted areas as so designated by the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Authority; 2) updating the definition of a KE so that it no longer automatically includes individuals whose total cash compensation is over $50,000 per year and to allow Tribal governments to designate other employees of a gaming enterprise as a KE so long as that designation is included in the Tribe’s gaming ordinance; 3) specifying that the definition of a PMO in § 502.19 applies to those with management authority over some facet of a gaming operation or enterprise, including the gaming operation’s general manager and its chief financial officer; 4) adding definitions for the terms “Gaming Enterprise” and “Tribal Gaming Regulatory Authority”; 5) clarifying in Part 556 that all KEs and PMOs of the gaming enterprise must be subject to a background investigation; and 6) amending Part 558 to require Tribal governments to notify the NIGC if it revokes a gaming license of a KE or PMO as well as to forward copies of the license revocation decision and a summary of the evidence it used to the NIGC. This proposed rule also clarifies that ordinances already in effect would not need to be amended to be consistent with the changes proposed to Part 556 or Part 558, but that all future ordinance submissions would have to comply.
12
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs