GRADING IGNITION INTERLOCK LAWS CONTINUED FIGURE 1.3
Pennsyl- vania
0
5.5*
10
0
9
0
5
2
0
31.5
F
Puerto Rico Rhode Island
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
35
5.5*
10
0
9
0
5
0
0
64.5
D
South Carolina South Dakota
0
5.5*
10
11.5*
9
2
0
0
0
38
F
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
Tennessee
35 35 35 35 35
11 11
10 10 10 10 10
0 0 0 0 0
9 9 0 9 9
2 2 0 2 2
0 0 5 5 5
2 0 0 0 0
0 3 0
69 70 50 75 75
D+ C-
Texas
Utah
0
F
Vermont Virginia Washing- ton
11 11
3** 3**
C C
35
11
10
0
9
2
5
2
3
77
C+
West Virginia
35
11
10
0
9
2
5
2
0
74
C
Wisconsin
0
5.5*
10
11.5*
0
2
5
0
0
34
F
Wyoming
0
0
10
0
0
2
5
1*
0
18
F
AVERAGE
51.13
F
*Partial credit as aspect of law only applies to certain drunk drivers. **Strong administrative IID law neutralizes threat of plea deals to avoid interlock use.
The grades are meant to encourage action in legislatures to improve drunk driving laws. MADD thanks prosecutors, law enforcement, highway safety officials and all of those involved with implementing current drunk driving laws to keep the public safe.
12 Ignition Interlock Report
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs