electricity sources.
Denmark. This is because the storage is not utilized frequently enough to justify the high initial investments.
In conclusion, while electricity storage is important, its high costs and losses make it less feasible to integrate renewable energy compared to thermal, gas, and liquid fuel storage. A more holistic approach that includes these alternative storage technologies offers better system balance and flexibility at lower costs, facilitating the integration of renewable energy into the overall energy system. Community vs. Individual Domestic Storage: Economies of scale significantly impact storage costs. Community-level storage, such as district heating systems, is much more cost-effective than individual domestic storage. Large-scale thermal storage, for instance, can reduce unit costs by a factor of five compared to smaller local systems. Although district heating systems incur heat losses, the overall efficiency improvements outweigh these losses. Similarly, economies of scale apply to electricity storage, though to a lesser extent. Designing renewable energy systems to avoid electricity storage and instead use thermal, gas, or liquid fuels at the community level facilitates the integration of fluctuating renewable electricity sources. Smart Energy Systems: Smart Energy Systems integrate smart electricity, thermal, and gas grids to identify synergies and achieve optimal solutions. This approach involves new technologies and infrastructures that create flexibility in energy conversion. Smart Energy Systems compensate for renewable resources' variability by linking electricity, thermal, and transport sectors. Heat pumps and electric vehicles play crucial roles in providing flexibility and storing renewable electricity. Electrofuels also connect the electricity and transport sectors, enabling renewable electricity
Annualized investment costs per use cycle for storing different forms of energy vary with the number of use cycles per year. Investments in electricity storage generally require 300-350 cycles annually to match the cost of producing renewable energy. Even at 400 cycles per year, where electricity storage investment costs fall below the upper range of renewable energy production costs, these include purchasing power to fill the storage, operation and maintenance—excluding storage or conversion losses. Thus, even without losses, the high initial investment costs in electricity storage make stored power only economically competitive with renewable electricity production if used almost daily. On the other hand, investments in thermal, gas, and liquid fuel storage remain feasible with significantly fewer annual cycles. These storage options allow energy storage over weeks, months, and even years due to lower investment costs. Therefore, the feasibility of these alternative storage technologies is much better, especially when the energy system is restructured to connect renewable energy with thermal, gas, and/or liquid storage technologies. While electricity storage directly impacts the integration of fluctuating renewable electricity sources like wind power, a simple comparison based on investment costs, cycle efficiencies, and investment costs per cycle shows that electricity storage is insufficient for achieving system balance. The electricity system requires constant balance, but other storage types offer more favorable solutions. By restructuring the energy system to connect renewable energy with thermal, gas, and liquid storage technologies, it becomes more cost- effective and efficient to integrate fluctuating renewable
6
HOTCOOL no.5 2024
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker