LOS Report - Historical Data (1994-2020)

1

FREEWAYS

STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS

Lanes

B

C

D

E

Class I (40 mph or higher posted speed limit)

4 6 8

45,100 65,300 85,900 101,600

59,000 86,600 114,500 135,600

70,300 104,100 138,100 161,900

72,600 108,900 145,300 181,800

Lanes Median

B

C

D

E

2 4 6

Undivided

* * *

14,400 34,000 52,100

16,200 35,500 53,500

** ** **

Divided Divided

10

Class II (35 mph or slower posted speed limit)

Freeway Adjustments

Lanes Median

B

C

D

E

Auxiliary Lanes

Ramp

Present in Both Directions

Metering

2 4 6

Undivided

* * *

6,500 13,300 14,200 9,900 28,800 31,600

+ 20,000

+ 5%

Divided Divided

16,000

44,900 47,600

Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10%

Median & Turn Lane Adjustments

UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS

Exclusive Left Lanes

Exclusive

Adjustment

Lanes Median

B

C

D

E

Lanes

Median

Right Lanes

Factors

2 4 6

Undivided 11,300

17,300 49,900 74,800

23,400 31,600 63,000 71,700 94,600 107,400

2 2

Divided

Yes

No No No No

+5% -20%

Divided Divided

34,600 51,700

Undivided

No

Multi Undivided Multi Undivided

Yes

-5%

No

-25% + 5%

Yes

Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments

Lanes

Median Divided

Exclusive left lanes

Adjustment factors

One-Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6 BICYCLE MODE 2

2

Yes Yes

+5% -5% -25%

Multi Undivided Multi Undivided

No

1 Values shown are presented as two-way annual average daily volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. 2 Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number of vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 3 Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of the higher traffic flow.

(Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Paved

Shoulder/Bicycle Lane Coverage

B

C

D

E

0-49% 50-84% 85-100%

*

2,600 5,500

6,100

19,500

1,900

18,400 >19,500

7,500 19,500 >19,500

**

PEDESTRIAN MODE 2 (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-49% * * 2,800 9,400 50-84% * 1,600 8,600 15,600 85-100% 3,800 10,500 17,100 >19,500 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) 3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% > 5 4 3 2 85-100% > 4 3 2 1

* Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults.

** Not applicable le for that level of service letter grade. For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults.

Source: Florida Department of Transportation Systems Implementation Office https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/

69

QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK

Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog