LOS Report - Historical Data (1994-2020)

1

STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS

FREEWAYS

Lanes Median

B

C

D

E

Lanes

B

C

D

E

2 4 6

Undivided

* * *

1,220 2,790 4,300

1,350 2,890 4,350

** ** **

4 6 8

3,650 5,130 6,600

5,040 7,250 9,490

5,950 8,670

6,640 9,950

Divided Divided

11,380

13,270

Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments

Freeway Adjustments Auxiliary Lanes Present in Both Directions + 1,800

(Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10%

Median & Turn Lane Adjustments

UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Rural Undeveloped

Exclusive Left Lanes

Exclusive

Adjustment

Lanes Median

Right Lanes

Factors

2 2

Divided

Yes

No No No No

+5% -20%

Lanes Median

B

C

D

E

Undivided

No

2 4 6

Undivided

440

820

1,330 5,290

2,710 5,960 8,950

Multi Undivided Multi Undivided

Yes

-5%

Divided Divided

2,960 4,450

4,270 6,420

No

-25% + 5%

7,930

Yes

Developed Areas

One-Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6

Lanes Median

B

C

D

E

2 4 6

Undivided

980

1,490 4,020 6,040

2,020 5,130

2,710 5,850 8,780

Divided Divided

2,780 4,180

7,710

Passing Lane Adjustments Alter LOS B-D volumes in proportion to the passing lane length to the highway segment length

BICYCLE MODE 2 (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.)

Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments

Lanes

Median Divided

Exclusive left lanes

Adjustment factors

2

Yes Yes

+5% -5% -25%

Rural Undeveloped

Multi Undivided Multi Undivided

Paved Shoulder/Bicycle Lane Coverage

No

B

C

D

E

0-49%

*

120 200 370

190 310

300

1 Values shown are presented as peak hour directional volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. 2 Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number of vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility.

50-84% 85-100%

100 250

1,010

1,760

>1,760

Developed Areas

Paved Shoulder/Bicycle Lane Coverage

B

C

D

E

0-49%

*

220 430

460

1,480

50-84% 85-100%

170 560

1,270

>1,760

* Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults.

1,760

>1,760

**

** Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults.

PEDESTRIAN MODE 2 (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-49% * * 220 840 50-84% * 120 780 1,390 85-100% 320 940 1,560 >1,820

Source: Florida Department of Transportation Systems Implementation Office https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/

77

QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK

Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog