LOS Report - Historical Data (1994-2020)

1

STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS

FREEWAYS

Lanes Median

B

C

D

E

Lanes

B

C

D

E

1 2 3

Undivided

* * *

670

740

** ** **

2 3 4

2,010 2,820 3,630

2,770 3,990 5,220

3,270 4,770 6,260

3,650 5,470 7,300

Divided Divided

1,530 2,360

1,580 2,400

Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments

Freeway Adjustments

Auxiliary Lane + 1,000

(Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10%

Median & Turn Lane Adjustments

UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Rural Undeveloped

Exclusive Left Lanes

Exclusive Right Lanes

Adjustment

Lanes Median

Factors

1 1

Divided

Yes No Yes No

No No No No

+5% -20% -25% + 5% -5%

Lanes Median

B

C

D

E

Undivided

1 2 3

Undivided

240

450

730

1,490 3,280 4,920

Multi Undivided Multi Undivided

Divided Divided

1,630 2,450

2,350 3,530

2,910 4,360

Yes

One-Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding directional volumes in this table by 1.2

Developed Areas

Lanes Median

B

C

D

E

1 2 3

Undivided

540

820

1,110 2,820 4,240

1,490 3,220 4,830

Divided Divided

1,530 2,300

2,210 3,320

Passing Lane Adjustments Alter LOS B-D volumes in proportion to the passing lane length to the highway segment length

BICYCLE MODE 2 (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.)

Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments

Lanes

Median Divided

Exclusive left lanes

Adjustment factors

Rural Undeveloped

1

Yes Yes

+5% -5% -25%

Paved Shoulder/Bicycle Lane Coverage

Multi Undivided Multi Undivided

No

B

C

D

E

0-49%

*

70

110 180

170 580

1 Values shown are presented as peak hour directional volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applications of the HCM and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. 2 Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number of vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility.

50-84% 85-100%

60

120 210

140

1,000

>1,000

Developed Areas

Paved Shoulder/Bicycle Lane Coverage

B

C

D

E

0-49% 50-84% 85-100%

*

120 240

260 720

840

100 320

1,000

* Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults.

1,000

>1,000

**

** Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults.

PEDESTRIAN MODE 2 (Multiply vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-49% * * 120 460 50-84% * 80 430 770 85-100% 180 520 860 >1,000

Source: Florida Department of Transportation Systems Implementation Office https://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/

83

QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK

Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog