written performance of students with mild disabilities. In No Child Left Behind: The Vital Role of Rural Schools, 22nd Annual National Conference Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES). Reno, NV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. ERIC Document Reproduc- tion Service No. ED463125. Bouck, E. (2106). A National Snapshot of Assistive Technology for Students with Disabilities. Journal of Special Education Tech- nology, 31(1). Boyle, E. A., Rosenberg, M.S,, Connelly, V.J., Washburn, S.G., Brinckerhoff, L.C., & Banerjee, M. (2003). Effects of audio texts on the acquisition of secondary-level content by students with mild disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 26, 203-214. Cochrane, D. & Key, K. (2014). Speech Recognition as AT for Writing. Downloaded from http://pub.lucidpress.com/2f091482- 82da-44a9-b8da-0f9c52f81482/ Cullen, J., Richards, S. B., & Lawless-Frank, C. (2008). Using Software to Enhance the Writing Skills of Students with Special Needs. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(2), 33-43. Daniel, D.B. & Woody, W.D. (2010). They hear, but do not listen: Retention for podcasted material in a class- room context, Teaching of Psychology, 37(3), 199-203, DOI: 10.1080/00986283.2010.488542 DeLaPaz, S. (1999). Composing via dictation and speech rec- ognition systems: Compensatory technology for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 22(3), 173- 182 Edmonds, M.S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tacket, K., & Schnakenberg, J.W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262-300. Englert, C.S., Wu, X., & Zhao, Y. (2005). Cognitive tools for writ- ing: Scaffolding the performance of student through technolo- gy. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 20(3), 184-198. Gajria,M., Jitendra, A.K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in student with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 210-225. Gonzalez-Ledo, M., Barbetta, P.M., Unzueta, C. (2015). The Ef- fects of Computer Graphic Organizers on the Narrative Writing of Elementary School Students with Specific Learning Disabili- ties. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(1), 29-42. Hetzroni, O.E. & Schreiber, B. (2004). Word processing as an assistive technology tool for enhancing academic outcomes for students with writing disabilities in the general classroom. Jour- nal of Learning Disabilities 37(2). 143-154. Hirsh, E.D., Jr. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowl- edge – of words and the world: Specific insights into the fourth grade slump and the nation’s stagnant comprehension scores. American Educator, Spring, 10–29. Hodapp, J. B., & Rachow, C. (2010). Impact of text-to-speech software on access to print: A longitudinal study. In S. Seok, E.E.
Meyen, & B. DaCosta (Eds.) Handbook of research on human cognition & assistive technology (pp. 199-219). Li, H., & Hamel, C. M. (2003). Writing issues in college students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature from 1990 to 2000. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(1), 29-46. MacArthur, C. A., & Cavalier, A. R. (2004). Dictation and Speech Recognition Technology as Test Accommodations. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 43-58. MacArthur, C.A., Graham, S., Schwartz, S.S., & Schafer, W.D. (1995). Evaluation of a writing instruction model that integrated a process approach, strategy instruction, and word processing. Learning Disability Quarterly 18(4), 278-291. Mayes, S. D., Calhoun., S. L., & Crowell, E. W. (2000). Learning Disabilities and ADHD: Overlapping Spectrum Disorders. Jour- nal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 417-424 McCollum, D., Nation, S., & Gunn, S. (2014). The effects of a speech-to-text software application on written expression for students with various disabilities. National Forum of Special Ed- ucation Journal, 25(1), 1-13. Meyer, N.K. & Bouck, E. (2014). The impact of text-to-speech on expository reading for adolescents with LD. Journal of Special Education Technology 29(1). 21-33. Moorman, A., Boon, R.T., Keller-Bell, Y., Stagliano, C., & Jeffs, T. (2010). Effects of text-to-speech software on the reading rate and comprehension skills of high school students with specif- ic learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(1), 41-49. Parr, M. (2013). Text-to-Speech Technology as Inclusive Reading Practice: Changing Perspectives, Overcoming Barriers. LEARNing Landscapes 6(2), 303-322. Quinlan, T. (2004). Speech Recognition Technology and Stu- dents With Writing Difficulties: Improving Fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 337. Reinking, D. (2005). Multimedia learning of reading. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 355–376. New York: Cambridge University Press. Seo, S., Brownell, M., Bishop, A., & Dingle, M. (2005). An exam- ination of beginning teacher instruction in special education in- structional reading practices that result in student engagement. Retrieved from http://www.coe.ufl.edu/copsse/docs/Engage- ment-LDW/1/Engagement-LDW.pdf Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., & Groner, R. (2011). Improving the usability of e-book readers. Journal of Usability Studies, 6(1), 25- 38. Silió, M. C., & Barbetta, P. M. (2010). The effects of word pre- diction and text-to-speech technologies on the narrative writ- ing skills of Hispanic students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(4), 17–32. Smith, S. J., & Okolo, C. (2010). Response to intervention and evidence-based practices: Where does technology fit? Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 257-272. Stodden, R.A., Roberts, K.D., Takahashi, K., Park, H.J. & Stod-
35
April / May, 2019 | www.closingthegap.com/membership Closing The Gap © 2019 Closing The Gap, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACK TO CONTENTS
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator