OVERCOOKED AND OUT OF TIME
T here is a precise point at which superfights can mature into greatness or over-marinate into prizefighting’s mire of wasted primes. It is based historically on some combination of conflicting promoters and broadcasters, money splits, timing and even ego. For almost a decade, the British public and indeed the global boxing electorate have been tantalized by the grandest heavyweight mirage of the modern era: Tyson “The Gypsy King” Fury vs. Anthony “AJ” Joshua. On and off, on and off, a fight to define a generation of heavyweights; a stadium- filling, U.K. nation-stopping collision of vastly contrasting personalities. It pitches Joshua, the Olympic gold medalist, a commercially polished, Adonis-like poster boy of Britain’s post-2012 sporting boom, against his greatest rival in Fury, the towering, unpredictable former lineal king, an eccentric boxing prodigy whose journey through personal darkness and ring redemption remains one of modern boxing’s most compelling narratives. Yet, as with other contests in history, the fight has fallen behind squabbles, rivalries and unexpected plot twists. And now, based on their recent outings, and with the fight finally coming together for later this year, the inescapable question looms large over the matchup: Have we waited too long? We have to consider where both men stand today. Joshua’s harrowing fifth- round knockout loss to Daniel Dubois at Wembley Stadium in 2024 served as a brutal reminder of the razor-thin margins at heavyweight, and his two- round drama against little-known Kristian Prenga this past July simply added to growing questions. Joshua tiptoed to the very precipice of sporting ruin against an unheralded Albanian opponent who felled him twice in the opening round. For an agonizing minute, the £200 million showdown with Fury dissolved into fine vapor. Meanwhile, Fury’s back-to-back
Sugar Ray Leonard vs. Roberto Duran III (1989)
ring wars against the master strategist Oleksandr Usyk stripped away the aura of invincibility that once surrounded The Gypsy King, and even after he returned to action with a calculated decision victory over Arslanbek Makhmudov, there were signs in the follow-up performance against 46-year- old Mariusz Wach that Father Time is marauding those freakish reflexes. Fury looked heavy and labored, relying on sheer bulk and attrition to wear down an opponent who has long since passed his sell-by date. Wach walked into the ring with seven defeats in his last 10 appearances. Both Joshua and Fury attempted to recalibrate their careers with stay-busy assignments, yet the psychological and physical miles on both men’s odometers have accumulated exponentially. The Fury-Joshua dynamic is not an isolated phenomenon. It is merely the latest chapter in boxing’s long, complicated relationship with superfight delays. Promoters love to preach the virtue of patience, arguing that marination builds anticipation, elevates pay-per-view numbers and inflates live gates. Sometimes, in rare moments of divine fortune, the eventual clash can transcend the wait to deliver an all-time classic. But far more often, we witness faded reflexes, lament lost opportunity and blame the toxic ecosystem that governs world championship boxing. Timing, ego and money. For Fury and Joshua, the timing is now or never, the egos are less at work, and the money is there in abundance through investment, notably spearheaded by master boxing engineer Turki Alalshikh. Reportedly there is £100 million-plus for each for the showdown, negotiated by their teams separately. The path should be clear. SUPERFIGHT FAILURES Delving into history, boxing has a litany of bouts that occurred long after their expiry date, serving up diluted spectacles that tarnished the memories of the legends involved.
When Sugar Ray Leonard and Roberto Duran met twice in 1980, they produced box-office gold. The “Brawl in Montreal” saw Duran impose his ferocious, relentless will over Leonard, while the “No Mas” rematch in New Orleans saw Leonard orchestrate a tactical master class in psychological warfare. Despite widespread disdain for Duran’s surrender in the second fight, many wanted a third to settle the score. Yet it took nine long years. By the time they finally locked horns at the Mirage in Las Vegas in December 1989, the burning fire of rivalry had burned down to embers. Leonard was 33, battling faded reflexes and multiple retirements; Duran was 38 and far removed from the formidable “Manos de Piedra” of the lightweight division. What should have been a fierce conclusion to a historic trilogy turned into a lethargic, tedious 12-round decision victory for Leonard. It was the classic example: The fight made fiscal sense for the promoters and yet offered zero competitive value to the sport’s legacy. They were both shadows of the great fighters they had been. Lennox Lewis vs. Mike Tyson (2002) Lennox Lewis practically cleaned out the heavyweight division during his march to the undisputed championship, which he won by outpointing Evander Holyfield in November 1999. The brilliant Brit reigned supreme until his shocking upset loss to Hasim Rahman in April 2001. When Lewis regained the throne with a brutal KO of Rahman seven months later, the most prominent remaining challenger was Mike Tyson. Tyson was no longer the Baddest Man on the Planet, but thanks to a one- punch KO of Frans Botha in 1999, an opening round blowout of Lou Savarese and a two-round dismantling of fellow headcase Andrew Golota in 2000, a legion of fans believed the volatile veteran could knock Lewis from his perch if given the opportunity. For more than three years, the
Joe Calzaghe vs. Roy Jones Jr. (2008)
The trilogy fight between Leonard and Duran was a disappointment.
clash between Iron Mike’s explosive aggression and Lewis’ majestic, long- range jab was a style-driven “dream fight” with the highest stakes. Unfortunately, the bout labored through years of litigation, promotional squabbles, network rivalries (HBO vs. Showtime) and outside-the-ring controversies. By the time the lawyers had worked their way through it, with the cable companies agreeing to share the broadcast, and the fighters finally met at the Pyramid Arena in Memphis in June 2002, it was too late. At 35, Tyson was a damaged, lethargic shell of the whirlwind that had conquered the division in the late 1980s. Lewis, 36, sharp and commanding under the tutelage of Emanuel Steward, systematically disassembled his faded opponent before knocking him out in the eighth round. While the event set pay-per-view records at the time, it felt less like a competitive clash of titans and more like a melancholy, one-sided execution of a past-his-prime icon.
For nearly a decade as Joe Calzaghe and Roy Jones Jr. glowed on either side of The Pond, global boxing fans debated how Wales’ Italian Dragon would fare against the pound-for- pound god of the 1990s. Between 1997 and 2003, when Jones was stringing together breathtaking displays of speed and athleticism at light heavyweight and Calzaghe was tearing through the super middleweight ranks, this matchup represented the holy grail. Instead, and I recall writing time and again about this and of the potential Calzaghe-Bernard Hopkins matchup, political obstacles and regional focus delayed the encounter until November 2008 at Madison Square Garden. By then, Jones, 39, had suffered catastrophic knockout losses to Antonio Tarver and Glen Johnson, his supernatural reflexes visibly eroded by age. Even Calzaghe, himself 36 and battling chronically damaged hands, admitted later that he feared a loss, but he survived an early knockdown in
Round 1 to slap his way to an emphatic, one-sided unanimous decision victory. While Calzaghe capped his career as one of the greatest Britons ever and retired undefeated, the hard fact is that we watched a master undoing an already- broken idol. In his prime, I would have given Jones the edge.
Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs. Manny Pacquiao (2015)
Perhaps no fight in boxing history illustrates the perils of being overcooked quite like Floyd “Money” Mayweather vs. Manny “PacMan” Pacquiao, in spite of its phenomenal commercial success. The optimal window for this megafight was indisputably 2010-2011, when Pacquiao was tearing through weight divisions at blinding speed and Mayweather was comfortably dominating around welterweight.
52 RINGMAGAZINE.COM
RINGMAGAZINE.COM 53
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker