Introduction: The Shift in Governance Reality For much of modern higher education history, boards have governed from a posture of institutional caretaking. Their fiduciary responsibilities, the duty of care and the duty of loyalty, were exercised primarily through the preservation of institutional mission, the stewardship of financial assets, and the maintenance of leadership continuity. Governance followed recognizable rhythms: presidential searches occurred once a decade or so, strategic plans were refreshed on similarly long cycles, capital campaigns and major investments commanded periodic attention, and, between these moments, governance remained steady and largely predictable. Trustees were expected to be engaged and accountable, but the implicit assumption was that the institution’s underlying trajectory was stable — and that the board’s role was to protect and sustain it.
That model no longer holds.
Today, governance in higher education is shaped far less by predictability and far more by sustained volatility, driven by overlapping waves of financial, political, legal, and reputational pressure that arrive with increasing frequency and intensity. Boards are no longer confronting one discrete challenge at a time; instead, they are managing clusters of interconnected, mutually reinforcing pressures, often without clear resolution in sight. The formal role of the board has not fundamentally changed. What has changed is the operating reality: the scale, pace, and complexity of decisions, as well as the level of public scrutiny under which they are made.
Boards are no longer confronting one discrete challenge at a time; instead, they are managing clusters of interconnected, mutually reinforcing pressures.
This report offers a candid snapshot of how trustees are experiencing governance right now. Not as it is articulated in bylaws or idealized in governance literature, but as it actually unfolds in boardrooms across higher education. This report draws on interviews with trustees representing a broad cross-section of institutions, governance models, and board roles across higher education. Despite differences in mission, scale, financial model, and governance structure, their accounts point to a remarkably consistent set of pressures and trade-offs.
02 | Boards of Trustees in Higher Education
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator