Designing Governance for Impact Amid these pressures, the strongest boards exhibit a distinct pattern of behavior. These boards name trade-offs rather than obscure them. They design their time rather than let agendas design them. Most critically, they treat governance as a capability requiring deliberate evolution, not a fixed structure to be defended. This matters because structure is not neutral. It shapes how issues surface, how decisions are made, and what receives attention. In many cases, governance challenges stem not from lack of effort or commitment, but from the persistence of practices no longer fit for purpose. The boards that adapt most effectively recognize this — and act on it. They reconsider committee structures, meeting cadence, and the boundaries between oversight and engagement. In some cases, they take a more deliberate approach to board composition, identifying capability gaps and recruiting trustees with the expertise current conditions demand. Embedding Continuous Evaluation Increasingly, this also includes a more deliberate focus on board self-assessment. Proactive boards are moving beyond periodic, compliance-oriented reviews toward more substantive evaluations of how effectively they operate: how decisions are made, how time is used, and how well board structures support strategic priorities. These assessments should ideally encompass both collective board performance and the contributions of individual trustees, recognizing that overall effectiveness depends on both. Independent, third-party perspectives may also be incorporated to provide an external view of board performance and dynamics. Rather than serving as a formal exercise, these efforts create space for reflection, helping ensure that governance evolves intentionally rather than reactively. These shifts point to a more active conception of governance. Not more operational, but more deliberate — more focused on framing choices, sequencing decisions, and maintaining alignment under pressure. In this sense, governing through disruption is less about doing more and more about doing differently.
18 | Boards of Trustees in Higher Education
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator