CRITERIA WEIGHT
PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA
GOAL(S)
9. Does the project create or enhance a connection between a vulnerable community and a planned or existing employment center?
Equity, Environment, Place, Connectivity
10
Maintenance 10. Does the project improve existing pavement, sidewalks, etc. on an existing transportation facility? Project Delivery 11. How involved is the projects development process? (e.g., Environmental clearance, ROW acquisition, Utility Relocation, Railroad Coordination, Flood Plain, Cost vs Benefit, Fatal Flaws)
Accountability
10
Accountability
10
Prioritizing LPA-Associated Projects
Using the criteria in Figure 17, the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) projects, listed below, were analyzed.
Eastchase Red Route Handley Green Route
• •
• East Lancaster Avenue from Main St to Riverside Dr • East Lancaster Avenue from Riverside Dr to IH-820 • East Lancaster Avenue from IH-820to Handley Dr • East Lancaster Avenue from Handley Dr to Dottie Lynn Pkwy • Brentwood Stair • Bridge Street
Table 18 shows the results of how the LPA projects performed under each of the nine criteria. Based on the results, the Handley Green Route was the top performing project while the East Lancaster Avenue from IH-820 to Handley Drive was the poorest performing project using the prioritization criteria.
184 Table of Contents
FORT WORTH EASTSIDE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease