WAKE FOREST PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN
Table 3 summarizes the strengths and weaknesses for each alternative. It combines the information in Table 1 and Table 2 to compare benefits and shortfalls of each alternative. Table 3. Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses for Each Alternative Strengths Weaknesses
• Connects to key activity centers and high ridership stops. • Increases service in Town’s core. • Shortens the WFL with fewer deviations. • Potentially near neutral operating cost change. • Adds service to high transit propensity area. • Complements circulator service(s) to provide additional connectivity. • Connects to key activity centers, S-Line, and high ridership stops. (B2) • Connects to all activity centers and S-Line stations. • Opportunity to reallocate circulator cost. • Expands services to places not serviced by WFL. • Potentially attracts more choice riders. • Potentially near neutral operating cost change.
• Changes an established service in the Town (WFL). • Two different routes may cause rider confusion. • Misses the S-Line station and high transit propensity area to the south. • Does not connect to Rolesville.
A
• Higher annual operating cost. • Does not connect to Rolesville.
B1 & B2
• Discontinues established WFL. • No fixed-route service in the Town. • Does not connect to Rolesville.
C
| 27 |
Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online