Ipnl aandndi int gi orne, dt uh ce ecdo no rc ge apnt ioz fa tt ii go hn ta il nf lt ee xg irbaitl ii ot yn i on f dEeRc Pi t o - sdiios nr u- mp tai ok ni n. gC od mu rpi na gn itehsef op lal os twt ihni gr t tyh- isse vs terna tme goyn trha st eodf t h e i r spue pe rp lgyr oc hu apisn apt earnf o8r 0m%a nccoen sf ii dg ne ni f ci cealne tvl ey l .w( oNrostee :t hI na np rt he pe iarr - ing this article, I asked SAP for review twice for factual accuracy and received no comments.) A Look At The Data St hAeP,s tuhpepfloy ucrht ahi nl a mr gaens ta gs oe mf t we na tr ea nc od mp pl aannnyi, nugnmd earr-kseetr v e d dc oumr i np ge tti ht ieo nl a. sI tn daedcdaidt ieo, ne ,nma balni nugf amc taurrki ne tg ocpo pmopr at unni ei tsyt hf oart focused on IT standardization of SAP planning to Enter - prise Resource Planning (ERP) significantly underper - faogremmeedn tt hf reoi rmp eMear rgc rho2u0p2i 0n ti no vAepnrt iol r2y0a2n3d. m a r g i n m a n - Oi nvge cr atphaebl ial si tti et hs rf eoer dt reacnasdaecst ,i oS nAaPl pmr aondaugceemd emnat r, kf ueet -l li en agd - tt hr aengslaocbt ai ol ne xi np taengsri iot ny ionf os ur dp eprl y- t oc h- caai snhs at hnrdo pu rgohc iumr ep-rtoov- pe da y solutions. However, the company was less successful in pp rl aonv ni di ni ngg) dt oe cbius si oi nnessus pl ep aodr te rt es cbhans oe ldo go ine sq u( saunpt ipt layt icvhea i n survey data of 107 business leaders. ( We sourced the respondents from our LinkedIn presence of over 330,000 followers.) The survey results reflect the period of April- May 2023.
Figure 4.7. Importance Versus Satisfaction of SAP Versus Competition
Note the relatively low importance score in the survey aa nn dd tghe eo gprearpf ohri ems a. )nTc he eg ampo. r( eT hs ui sc sc ue sr sv feuyl icsocmr opsasn- ii en sd ua us tgr y - mg i eesn tt eodi mt hper oS Av eP tphlea ndne ipntgh saonfdt ws apreee dwoi tfhaontahl ye sr itse. c h n o l o - What Can We Learn? Nt hoe smo fi tsws i aorne acnodmrpeaqnuyi rbe umi lednst sb eatrtee rc lseoafrt wt haarne tchoed eS AwPh e n team. However, in the case of supply chain planning, SAP swung and missed. In examining the data, there are five root issues. Evolution. The company’s move in advanced plan- ne si npge cf iraolml y tphreo bAlPe Om at ot i tch. Te hI Be Pmpyloapt fioc rfmo ciuns 2o0n1S2awl eas s and Operations planning (S&OP) on the HANA plat - finoromthwerasaraenaos.pportunity cost slowing development Usability. The solution is challenging to use and rnaotleosg lyo awl soonl abguss bi neehsi sn dl e at hdee rmaacrckeeptt iann sc ce e. nT ahrei ot e c h -
148
149
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator