An Answer I Got Wrong
Ta ne cdhenxoel cougtye tsot rma taekgei ebse? t Wt e rh yd edcoi se iso int sm? aGtat ienr ?i nTshi gehs tes q? uCer sa-f t tui aolns sl eaar rentionpg ot hf empi nr idn ac si pIl ews roa fpouupt sai dcel a- isns souf p1p5l4y icnhdaiivni d - planning processes. The continuation of the belief in the definition of today’s sthuaptpilsyachbaitinofpalamnnesinsg. is a tangled web that we weave Let me start with a story. The year was 2004. My client, nf oarmAeMd RP eRtees, ewa or cr hk e(dn of owr GK ar ar tf nt e( nr )o. wT hMi so cnadl el lwe za )s. bI ewf oo rr ek et hd e si mp lpi tl eomf Ke nr at if nt gi nKt or aMf to’ sngdleolbēazl asnudp pHleyi nc hz a, ai nt tsht reabt eeggyi n. (nHi negi so f now retired, and I should be.) On the call, Pete gave me a hard time. His position was that my research was not aggressive enough in defining gt ol oubnadl es ruspt pa nl ydchhiasi np opilnatn, na inndg Ir ae mq u ni roetms eu nr et sh. eI swt raus gcgl leeadr himself, but I remember the conversation. Ah as bai thsi gdhi eshc ha rodo. l) dI ewbaast ewr,oIrlkoivneg ao gnoao Md ua rl tgi u- Emnet enrt p. (rOi sled
170
171
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator