Populo - Volume 1, Issue 1

advocates for a realization-based comparison of actual institutions and

behaviour, rather than the search for “perfectly just institutions” on which

theories of justice are typically focused (Sen, 2009). The author draws attention

to the problems of feasibility and redundancy that are inevitably present in a

transcendental agreement of justice. The example employed, “Three Children

and a Flute”, suggests that three different Children claim a flute – the one who

made it, the one who knows how to play it, and the poorest one among the

three. Different perspectives would suggest different responses regarding who

should get the flute, all with meaningful arguments in their support, illustrating

the difficulty in establishing a unique set of principles. Consequently, Sen

considers a transcendental identification of justice to be neither necessary nor

sufficient (Sen, 2009:4).

Much of Sen’s criticism is directed at John Rawls, as the developer of the

most widely accepted theory of justice. Nonetheless, Sen draws a lot from

Rawls’s work, particularly from his account of justice as fairness, which has been

crucial to the overall understanding of the impartiality requirements of justice.

Yet, Rawls’ theory is what Sen identifies as “transcendental institutionalism”. The

assumption that in the original position, under the “veil of ignorance”, everyone

would choose the same highly specific principles, does not account for the

“plurality of sustainable reasons”, or the several conflicting matters that should

concern justice (Sen, 2009: 2). Accordingly, Rawls’s theory seems to be too

focused on just institutions and disregarding of actual behavioural patterns to fit

into Sen’s realization-based resolutions. Additionally, although the “veil of

ignorance” eliminates the possibility of biased decision-making at the individual

level, it fails to eliminate group prejudices, potentially allowing the persistence

of parochial values which compromise objectivity (Sen, 2009:6). The contractual

nature of the Rawlsian perspective also seems to eliminate the possibility of

38

Made with FlippingBook HTML5