Harvey, S. & Ward, A. (2017). From Striving to Thriving: How to Grow Confident, Capable Readers . New York, NY: Scholastic. Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J., Nelson, J. R., & Brown, J. (2016). The effects of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 609. Henbest, V. S. & Apel, K. (2017). Effective word reading instruction: What does the evidence tell us? Communication Disorders Quarterly , 39(1), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740116685183 Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third- grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Hwang, H., Cabell, S. Q. & Joyner, R. E. (2022). Does cultivating content knowledge during literacy instruction support vocabulary and comprehension in the elementary school years? A systematic review. Reading Psychology , 44(2), 145–174. https://doi.org/10 .1080/02702711.2022.2141397 Jones, C. D., Clark, S. K., & Reutzel, D. R. (2012). Enhancing alphabet knowledge instruction: Research implications and practical strategies for early childhood educators. Early Childhood Education Journal , 41(2), 81-89. Kane, T. & Sean Reardon. (2023, May 11). Parents Don’t Understand How Far Behind Their Kids Are in School. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/05/11/ opinion/pandemic-learning-losses-steep-but-not- permanent.html Karoly, L. A. (2015). Economic impact of achievement gaps in Pennsylvania’s public schools. RAND Corporation. Kieffer, M. J., Mancilla-Martinez, J. & Logan, J. K. (2021). Executive functions and English reading comprehension growth in Spanish-English bilingual adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology , 73, 101238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. appdev.2021.101238 Kim, J. S., Burkhauser, M. A., Mesite, L. M., Asher, C. A., Relyea, J. E., Fitzgerald, J. & Elmore, J. (2021). Improving reading comprehension, science domain knowledge, and reading engagement through a first-grade content literacy intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology , 113(1), 3–26. https://doi. org/10.1037/edu0000465 Kirsch, I., de Jong, J., LaFontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J. & Monseur, C. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries: Results from PISA 2000 . Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved May 29, 2015 from http:// www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternational studentassessmentpisa/33690904.pdf Koskinen, P. S., McCarthey, S. J., & Hoffman, J. V. (1995). National reading research center. The Reading Teacher, 49(1), 72-75. Kuhfeld, M. & Lewis K. (2022). COVID-19 in the early elementary years: A comparison of achievement in Spring 2019 and Spring 2022. Collaborative for Student Growth . NWEA.
Hiebert, E. H. (1999). Text matters in learning to read. The Reading Teacher , 52(6), 552-566.
Hiebert, E. H., Goodwin, A. P. & Cervetti, G. N. (2017). Core vocabulary: Its morphological content and presence in exemplar texts. Reading Research Quarterly , 53(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ rrq.183 Hiebert, E. H., Goodwin, A. P., & Cervetti, G. N. (2018). Core vocabulary: Its morphological content and presence in exemplar texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.183 Hiebert, E. H. (2019). Teaching Words and How They Work: Small changes for big vocabulary results. New York, NY: Teacher College Press. Hiebert, E. H. (2020). The core vocabulary: The foundation of proficient comprehension. The Reading Teacher , 73(6), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1002/ trtr.1894 Hiebert, E. H. & Reutzel, D. R. (2010). Revisiting silent reading: New directions for teachers and researchers. International Reading Association. Hudson, R. F., Torgesen, J. K., Lane, H. B. & Turner, S. J. (2012). Relations among reading skills and sub- skills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers. Reading and Writing , 25, 483–507. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11145-010-9283-6 Hughes, C. A., Morris, J. R., Therrien, W. J., & Benson, S. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140-148.
SCHOLASTIC LITERACY FRAMEWORK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 22
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs