Retour vers le menu
folles ambiguïtés exaltantes et les paradoxes de la nature de l'objet, de l'inconscient lui-même.
Voir aussi : CONFLIT (LE) CONTENANCE : CONTENANT-CONTENU (LA) CONTRE-TRANSFERT (LE) IDENTIFICATION PROJECTIVE (L’) THÉORIES DE RELATION D’OBJET (LES)
RÉFÉRENCES
Abend, S.M. (1990). Unconscious fantasies, structural theory, and compromise formations. J Am Psychoanal Assoc, 38:61-73. Abend, S.M. (2005). Analyzing intrapsychic conflict: compromise formation as an organizing principle. Psychoanal Q , 74:5-25. Abraham, K. (1923). Contributions to the theory of the anal character. Int J Psychoanal 4:400- 418. Abraham, K. (1925). The history of an impostor in the light of psychoanalytic knowledge. Psychoanal Q 4:570-587. Abraham, K. (1926). Character-formation on the genital level of libido- development. Int J Psychoanal 7:214-222. Akhtar, S. (ed.) (2009). Comprehensive Dictionary of Psychoanalysis . London: Karnac. Alexander, B., Feigelson, S., Gorman, J.M. (2005). Integrating the psychoanalytic and neurobiological views of panic disorder. Neuropsychanal 7:129-141. Anzieu, D. (1981). Le groupe et l’inconscient: L'imaginaire groupal . Paris: Dunod. Anzieu, D. (1995). The Skin-Ego . Segal N, translator, London: Karnac. Arlow, J.A. (1961). Ego psychology and the study of mythology. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 9:371-393.
267
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker