Defense Acquisition Research Journal #109

The ‘Shrinking’ Defense Industrial Base

of those contractors, making this the final sample selected to receive survey invitations.

TABLE 1. SAMPLE FRAME

Presumed Exits

Presumed Exits w/ POC

Unique Contractors

Fiscal Year

(Count)

(Percentage)

(Count)

(Percentage)

2015

67,768

12,057

17.8%

3,868

32.1%

2016

65,669

11,790

18.0%

4,266

36.2%

2017

63,548

11,885

18.7%

5,010

42.2%

2018

60,502

11,660

19.3%

5,962

51.1%

2019

57,154

11,530

20.2%

7,053

61.2%

2020

53,866

11,083

20.6%

8,341

75.3%

2021

52,018

13,170

25.3%

10,797

82.0%

2022

48,476

--

--

--

--

Total

401,233

83,175

20.7%

45,297

54.5%

Note. POC = Point of Contact.

Survey The George Mason University Institutional Review Board approved the survey content and distribution, and the authors followed all applicable research protocols to protect human subjects’ privacy. For example, at the outset, the authors informed participants of the purpose of the survey, the expected time for completion, and contact details of the research team to field any potential questions or concerns. Participants also received assurance that all responses would remain confidential and that only aggregated results would be reported. The authors chose Qualtrics to conduct the survey from May 30, 2023, to June 25, 2023, with a median completion time of 4 minutes and 12 seconds. Each survey recipient received a customized email text invitation and first survey page, including the contractor’s name, Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number (another unique identifier used prior to UEI), and presumed fiscal year of exit. Respondents were first required to confirm that the referenced contractor had in fact exited the DIB; those who answered negatively to this question were thanked for their willingness to participate and exited early from the survey. The survey then directed respondents who confirmed that the contractor had indeed left the DIB to two demographic questions about the contractor (net revenue and full-time employee count), followed by a question about the primary reason why the contractor no longer held a prime contract with DoD. Two answer choices from

200

Defense ARJ, Summer 2025, Vol. 32 No. 2: 194—223

Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker