Community Integration AAC devices are most effective when users participate actively in their communities. Encouraging involvement in inclusive recreational programs, volunteering opportunities, or public events can reinforce AAC use and reduce stigma. For example, users can join local community centers, contribute to food bank efforts, or attend advocacy events to raise awareness about AAC. Continuous Monitoring and Feedback Ongoing support is essential for addressing challenges and adapting devices to evolving needs. Regular follow-ups with AAC specialists ensure technical issues are resolved, and feedback mechanisms allow users and caregivers to share experiences and request adjustments. Scheduled check-ins help maintain the device’s functionality and relevance, while routine updates align the technology with the user’s changing circumstances. CONCLUSION AAC devices have the potential to transform lives, but their success depends on thoughtful planning, training, and sustained support. Preventing abandonment requires collabo- ration among families, professionals, and communities. By advocating for comprehensive assessments, personalized interventions, and inclusive environments, assistive technology professionals can ensure that every AAC user has the tools and confidence to communicate effectively and fully participate in all daily activities and environments. REFERENCES Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2020). Augmentative and Alter- native Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs (5th Edition). Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., & Judge, S. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47(2), 115–129. Helling, C., & Minga, J. (2014). Developing an Effective Frame- work for the Augmentative and Alternative Communication Evaluation Process. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alterna- tive Communication. 23 (2), pp.91-98 Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspec- tives of speech-language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Commu- nication, 22(2), 85–99.
Light, J. (1989). Toward a Definition of Communicative Compe- tence for Individuals Using Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems. AAC Journal.
Phillips, B., & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5(1), 36–45.
Rush, E. & Helling, C. (2013). AAC Assessment: Merging Personal And Clinical Evidence To Support Quality Outcomes. Session presented at the 2013 ASHA Convention, Chicago, IL
February / March, 2025 | https://www.closingthegap.com/benefits-of-membership/ 5 Closing The Gap © 2025 Closing The Gap, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACK TO CONTENTS
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator