Initial Site-Specific De-Inventory Report for Big Rock Point Report No.: RPT-3014537-002
o Lift of TS125 and cradle located on beams off stand/goldhofer on to cask railcar ( note: a direct transfer from barge-to-rail is assumed available ) Based on these assessments and the duration of each of the individual routes, neither the barge nor HHT routes are favored over one another. 5.3.3.11 Cumulative Population Dose along Route The cumulative population dose along each route is expected to be negligible (comparable to background) due to the significant amount of shielding afforded by these TS125, the age of the SNF, and the minimal duration of exposure to the TS125. The relative differences in preferences established for the assessment of this metric are based primarily on the total exposed population established from data provided by START [1] along each route as shown in Table 5-5. Those routes with the lowest total exposed populations are favored over the other routes. TABLE 5-5: ROUTE AVERAGED POPULATION DENSITY ALONG EACH ROUTE
Total Exposed Population Estimate** (Millions)
Cumulative Population Density (Persons/Square Mile)*
#
Route Description
HHT to Clarion Ave. in Petoskey, MI (Option 1)
1
526.93
0.424
HHT to Washinton St. in Petoskey, MI (Option 1)
2
530.08
0.427
HHT to Clarion Ave. in Petoskey, MI (Option 2)
3
502.43
0.437
HHT to Washinton St. in Petoskey, MI (Option 2)
4
505.38
0.440
5
HHT to Gaylord, MI (Option 1)
571.6
0.513
6
HHT to Gaylord, MI (Option 2)
536.26
0.423
7
Barge to Milwaukee, WI
659.36
0.417
* Data established by START [1] and established by totaling the population located within an 800-m buffer of either side of the route and dividing by the area of the buffer. ** Established by multiplying the cumulative population density by the route distance and the buffer width (1600 m).
Page 5-23
Initial Site-Specific De-Inventory Report for Big Rock Point May 10, 2017
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker