REFERENCIAS
Andersson, D. E. (2014). How Does Stronger Patent Laws Affect Trade in Technology? Evidence from Patent Transfers in Sweden 1871-1914. In Druid Academy Conference, Rebild, Aalborg, Denmark. http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/druid/acc_papers/0bm72m59ouh4re4il4hltrc6d1na.pdf Arce, R., del Rey, J., Encinas D., Hidalgo, A., Malvido, G. & Pérez, J.A. (2006). Patentes. Situación de las patentes en España. Escuela de Organización Industrial - OEPM. Madrid (disponible en books.google.es ). Arundel, A. (2001). The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research policy, 30 (4), 611-624. Blank, R. M., & Kappos, D. J. (2012). Intellectual property and the US economy: industries in focus. Economics and Statistics Administration & US Patent and Trademark Office. Brouwer, E., & Kleinknecht, A. (1999). Innovative output, and a firm’s propensity to patent.: An exploration of CIS micro data. Research policy, 28 (6), 615-624. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their inte llectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not) (No. w7552). National Bureau of Economic Research. Comisión Europea (2018). European Innovation Scoreboard 2018. Bruselas, Luxemburgo. De Rassenfosse, G., & de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2009). A policy insight into the R&D–patent relationship. Research Policy, 38 (5), 779-792. EPO, O. (2013). Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in the European Union. Gambardella, A., Giuri, P. & Luzzi, A. (2007). The market for patents in Europe, Research Policy, 36 , p. 1163-1183. Guellec, D., & de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2001). The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data. Research Policy, 30 (8), 1253-1266.
40
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker