> Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2002). New evidence of classroom computers and pupil learning. Economic Journal, 112/482 , 735–765.
> Leuven, E., Lindahl, M., Oosterbeek, H., & Webbink, D. (2007), The effect of extra funding for disadvantaged pupils on achievement. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89/4 , 721–736.
> Area, M., & González, C.S. (2015). De la enseñanza con libros de texto al aprendizaje en espacios online gamificados. Educatio Siglo XXI, Vol. 33 nº 3 2015, pp. 15-38. http://dx.doi. org/10.6018/j/240791 > Area, M., Alonso, C., Correa, J.M., del Moral, M.E., de Pablos, J., Paredes, J., Peirats, J., Sanabria, A,L., San Martín, A., & Valverde, J. (2014). Las políticas educativas TIC en España después del Programa Escuela 2.0: las tendencias que emergen. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 13(2).
> Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (2019). Sistema Estatal de Indicadores de Educación 2020. Disponible en: https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:7bd02364-3fd2-405f-b0d6- 4fe05debbd38/seie-2020.pdf > Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (2020). Resolución de 2 de julio de 2020, de la Dirección General de Evaluación y Cooperación Territorial, por la que se publica el Acuerdo de la Conferencia Sectorial de Educación sobre el marco de referencia de la competencia digital docente. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 191 , 50638-50668. Disponible en: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/ res/2020/07/02/(2)
> Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models. Newbury Park, Sage.
> Chu, S.K.W., Tse, S.K., Chow, K. Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library & Information Science Research, 33, 132–143.
> OCDE (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en.
> OCDE (2017). PISA 2015 Technical Report. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/ sitedocument/PISA-2015-technical-report-final.pdf
> DuGoff, E.H., Schuler, M., & Stuart, E.A. Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Serv Res. 2014; 49:284–303.
> OCDE (2018a). How has the internet use changed between 2012 and 2015? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1e912a10-en
> Ferraro, S. (2018). Is information and communication technology satisfying educational needs at school? Computers & Education, 122 , 194–204.
> OCDE (2019a). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
> Gómez-Fernández, N. & Mediavialla, M. (2018). Do Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) improve educational outcomes? Evidence for Spain in PISA 2015. IEB Working Paper 2018/20. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/126961/1/IEB18-20_Gomez+Mediavilla.pdf
> OCDE (2019b). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Disponible en: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/35665b60-endf?expires=1592984088&id=id&accname=g uest&checksum=9BF9DD1B4D698E37CC78CC3C4FD435AB
> Goolsbee, A., & Guryan, J. (2006). The impact of internet subsidies in public schools. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88/2, 336–347.
> OCDE (2020). A note about Spain in PISA 2018: Further analysis of Spain’s data by testing date (updated on 23 July 2020). Disponible en: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA2018-AnnexA9-Spain.pdf
> Gubbels, J., Swart, N.M., & Groen, M.A. (2020). Everything in moderation: ICT and reading performance of Dutch 15-year-olds. Large-scale Assessments in Eduction, 8(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-0079-0 > Gumus, S., & Atalmis, E.H. (2011). Exploring the Relationship between Purpose of Computer Usage and Reading Skills of Turkish Students: Evidence from PISA 2006. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 129–140.
> Petko, D., Cantieni, A., & Prasse, D. (2017). Perceived Quality of Educational Technology Matters: A Secondary Analysis of Students’ ICT Use, ICT-Related Attitudes, and PISA 2012 Test Scores. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(8) , 1070–1091. > Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49–58.
> Hattie, J. (2013). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analysis Relating to Achievement. International Review of Education, 57, 219–221.
> Wooldridge, J. (2002). Inverse probability weighted M-estimators for sample selection, attrition, and stratification. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1, 117-119.
> Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F.K.S. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125(2018) , 1–13.
> Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Second Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
> Krusten, M. (2019). Digitalisation in service of education nation. E-estonia. Disponible en: https://e-estonia.com/education-nation/
> Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2016). How does ICT use influence students’ achievements in math and science over time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2431-2449.
142
143
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker