Hope is a theme of warmth, honesty and resilience. It is not escapism or false positivity, but a practical form of optimism rooted in action. It asks how design can support care, comfort and possibility while responding to the urgent need to rethink consumption. This sense of hope is closely connected to trust and change. It calls for a more progressive and honest approach to design, rooted in responsibility, transparency and long-term thinking. Sustainability is no longer an added layer, but a fundamental expectation shaping how buildings, interiors, materials and finishes are specified. The built environment remains central to this challenge. The 2024/25 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction states that the sector consumes 32 per cent of global energy and contributes 34 per cent of global CO2 emissions.[7] This reinforces the need to consider longevity, reuse and impact at every stage of design. Within this context, sustainability is evolving. Getty Images’ VisualGPS research showed declining visual searches for the broad term ‘sustainability’, alongside rising interest in renewable energy, energy efficiency and environmental conservation. This suggests concern is becoming more specific, practical and action-led. People are also increasingly sceptical of green claims and polished institutional messaging. The response is a demand for greater honesty: a ‘tell it straight’ approach where materials, supply chains, processes and trade- offs are made more visible. Yorgos Chalkias framed the challenge through the idea of a finite planet: resources and the systems that absorb waste both have limits. Environmental, social and economic pressures are interconnected, and design cannot assume an endless supply of materials or capacity for pollution.
He also highlighted the tension between quality and quantity. Improvements in recycled materials, efficiency and durability are important, but can coexist with rising overall consumption. This rebound effect means better products alone cannot offset the impact of making and buying more. Sustainability therefore needs to move towards sufficiency: enough, rather than excessive. True change requires reducing unnecessary production and extending the life of what already exists through repair, reuse, sharing and adaptation. This is particularly relevant to buildings and interiors, which shape both material demand and many of the consumption patterns that take place within them. This thinking connects environmental responsibility with quality of life. Slower living, community access, shared use and an acceptance of imperfection can reduce pressure on resources while supporting wellbeing. The growth of repair initiatives and second- hand platforms shows how longer use can become both practical and culturally desirable. It also creates a more honest design language: one that values texture, patina, repair and materials that can age gracefully. Rather than presenting sustainability through predictable green cues, design can show where materials come from, how they are made and how they can be maintained or adapted over time. Hope is therefore a theme of changemaking. Technology and material-aware design can support better decisions, including designing for disassembly, reducing sampling and considering whole product lifecycles from the outset. But the wider direction is cultural: from speed to care, short-term novelty to long-term value, and ownership to extended or shared use. In this landscape, hope is not loud or idealised. It is practical, evolving and built through the choices made by designers, manufacturers and the people who use the spaces they create.
Crown | Colour Insights | 2027/2028 | page 25
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter maker