Defense Acquisition Magazine September-October 2026

Figure 4. Program Schedule Gantt Chart from WSE 006

any time to assess schedule, risk, de - sign, cost estimates, test status, and manufacturing readiness. Moreover, the audit trail includes common time - stamps so that anyone accessing the system can see when the last update was applied to the model. Limitations According to a WarU workshop, cloud-enabled system modeling and Project Life-Cycle Management (PLM) tools like Cameo and TWC do not na - tively support all types of low-level physics-based models that special - ized technical developers may use, such as material tensile-strength es - timates, thermodynamic tests, and reliability engineering. However, with the integration of automated programming interfaces (APIs), it may be possible to input re - sults from these detailed tests into more comprehensive models or to forward-transcribe the main results in a manner no worse than the existing constellation of records. According to a WarU digital acquisition modeling workshop, many organizations prefer to transcribe results with timestamps into a unified system rather than rely on traditional methods. On the other hand, the workshop also notes that there is no set way to guarantee that MBSE with cloud plat - forms is the absolute best-ever design method; it is only the best method identified so far. Proof of efficacy is not proof of optimality. It is left to further research to test a litany of DoW-approved modeling and life-cy - cle management tools to determine the optimal tech stack under various acquisition strategies. Yet, getting at least one technical stack to service a

0 Program Milestones Actual Strategic Phase Name

Apr 14, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Start Date End Date Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 14, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 14, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 Apr 14, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026

13

14

15

16

0 Program Milestones

0.1 PDR 0.2 CDR 0.3 PCA 1.1 AUGV Vehicle 1.1.1 Chassis 1.1.2 Sensor 1.1.3 Drive 1.1.4 Control

1.1 AUGV Vehicle 1.1.1 Chasis 1.1.2 Sensor 1.1.3 Drive 1.1.4 Control

1.2 Program Management 1.2.1 Scheduling 1.2.2 Technical Reviews

1.2 Program Management

1.2.1 Scheduling 1.2.2...

1.2.3 Configur... 1.1.4 Requirements...

1.2.3 Configuration Management Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.2.4 Requirements Traceability Matrix Apr 14, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.3 Logistics Supportability Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.3.1 BOM and Sourcing Apr 15, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 1.3.2 GFE Apr 14, 2026 Apr 14, 2026 1.3.3 Lifecycle Cost Estimate Apr 16, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.3.4 <enter WBS element title> Apr 14, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.4 Test & Evaluation Apr 15, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 1.4.1 Test Plan Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.4.2 Operational Test & Evaluation Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.4.3 Development Test & Evaluation Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.4.4 Reports Apr 14, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.5 SE & Integration Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.5.1 Design Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.5.2 Manufacturing & Fabrication Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.5.3 Assembly Apr 15, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 1.5.4 Subsystem Development Testing Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.6 Training Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.6.1 Assembly Training Apr 16, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.6.2 Maintenance & Troubleshooting Apr 16, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.6.3 Operator Training Apr 16, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.6.4 <enter WBS element title> Apr 15, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.7 Data Apr 15, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 1.7.1 State Diagram Apr 15, 2026 Apr 15, 2026 1.7.2 Logic Program Apr 16, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.7.3 <enter WBS element title> Apr 16, 2026 Apr 16, 2026 1.7.4 <enter WBS element title>

1.3 Logistic Supportability

1.3.1 BOM and...

1.4 Test & Evaluation

1.4.1.

1.4.2 Op...

1.4.3 Devlo...

1.4.4 Reports

1.5 SE & Integration

1.5.1 Design

1.5.2 Manuf... 1.5.3 Asse..

1.6 Training

1.6.1...

1.7 Data

Source. Author

tent spillage can be managed with rollback features for version control. From a workforce management perspective, student participants from various career fields and years of service were able to navigate modern drop-down menus in both the Cameo and TWC side of the application. The most stressful aspect may be the cultural bias desiring classical stand- alone program document artifacts. To address upskilling needs, work - shops incorporated structured train - ing modules, guided onboarding, and live coaching sessions to help partic - ipants build confidence with digital

engineering tools regardless of prior technical experience. Leaders plan - ning transitions can encourage peer mentorship, open feedback channels, and designate digital tool champions within teams to support adoption and resolve issues. Change-management strategies also include setting clear success metrics, communicating benefits, and gradually integrating new workflows to reduce resistance. With 24/7/365 data management and automated product workflow, preliminary and critical design reviews can be evalu - ated by any authorized stakeholder at

Figure 5. Risk Management Identification and Severity Assessment

# 2 3 4 5 1

Risk Name

Risk Name

Type of Risk

Likelihood

Consequence

Status

(U) Test Range Availability (U) Test Timeline (U) False Alarm (U) Assembly Time (U) Unit Cost

Programmatic Programmatic Technical Technical Business (External)

1 1 1 2 1

Test range is unavailable due to other teams usage Test for testing is too short Sensor reports a false positive Assembly time exceeds 240s Unit cost exceeds $12k

3 2 4 5 5

Open Open Open Open Open

Source. Author

24 DEFENSE ACQUISITION MAGAZINE | SEPTEMBER –OCTOBER 2026

Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker