The Board’s Democratic majority cited several reasons for reinstating the stricter standard:
• Alignment with Statutory Goals: The clear and unmistakable waiver standard better supports the National Labor Relations Act’s (NLRA) core purpose of fostering industrial peace through collective bargaining, it said. • Consistency with Precedent: This standard purportedly aligns with more than 70 years of Board practice and is endorsed by the U.S. Supreme Court, according to the Board majority, providing employers with a more stable and predictable framework. • Harmony with Federal Courts: The majority of federal Courts of Appeals have applied the clear and unmistakable waiver test, ensuring consistency across jurisdictions. In contrast, the contract coverage test – adopted in the 2019 case of MV Transportation during the first Trump administration – had allowed employers to interpret broad management rights clauses as permission to make unilateral changes, diminishing unions’ bargaining leverage. The NLRB Chairman at the time emphasized that this return to the historical standard underscores the importance of explicit union consent in a statement that accompanied the decision. “Today’s decision makes clear that an employer has the obligation to bargain over changes to wages and working conditions, unless the union expressly yields its right to bargain over an employer’s decision,” Lauren McFerran said in December while she was NLRB Chairman. “Returning to the clear and unmistakable waiver standard better serves the pro-bargaining policy of the Act.” Implications for Employers This ruling significantly affects how employers must handle workplace changes in unionized settings. Key takeaways include: • Narrow Interpretation of CBAs: Broadly worded management rights clauses may no longer provide sufficient authority for certain unilateral actions. • Increased Risk of Violations: Employers are more likely to face unfair labor practice charges if they act without ensuring explicit union waivers. • Pro-Bargaining Emphasis: The decision strengthens unions’ ability to contest changes and demand negotiations. 5 Steps for Employers To adjust to this new landscape, employers should consider taking the following five steps: 1. Thoroughly Review Your CBAs • Conduct a detailed review of all collective bargaining agreements to identify any ambiguous language in management rights clauses. • Clarify provisions during negotiations to specify when unilateral changes are permissible.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • fisherphillips.com Copyright © 2025 Fisher Phillips LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Creator