F INDINGS AND QUESTIONS THAT CHALLENGE OR DEBUNK THE C OVID NARRATIVE
▪ No one knew or knows the long-time impact of taking the Covid shots. Many deaths and injuries have already occurred among people who took the Covid shots. However, these deaths and injuries are being silenced. Will the long-term effects of taking the Covid shots be worse than the short and mid-term effects? ▪ Dr. Fauci and others made several statements indicating that the Covid pandemic was planned and calculated. Event 201 was a great coincidence. Why did the masses of people not believe them? Will they do it again?
▪ According to VAERS, the Covid shots have potentially killed roughly three times more people than all the other vaccines combined since 1990. Shouldn’t this be enough to stop the Covid shots?
▪ While the CDC dismisses VAERS, the CDC and FDA don’t possess and didn’t develop a tracking system that sufficiently tracks deaths and injuries from taking the Covid shots. Why wasn’t this a priority? How do they know that deaths and injuries from the Covid shots are rare, if an efficient tracking system isn’t in place? ▪ The FDA and CDC both made presentations in 2020, showing that the Covid shots can cause major health issues such as death, Guillain-Barre syndrome, myocarditis, strokes, clotting problems, pregnancy complications, autoimmune disorders and many other issues. Why were these potential issues not shared with the masses of people during the shot rollout? ▪ When presented with “freedom of information” requests, why have governments and public health agencies not provided written proof that the Covid virus exists? This shouldn’t be a problem. Not doing so opens the door for people to believe that the virus doesn’t exist. ▪ The PCR test is a tool that can’t diagnose clinical disease. Even if a PCR test is positive, it can’t determine whether or not the positive genome sequence is the material that’s causing sickness. Thus, what are the real numbers of Covid cases and deaths in the US and across the world? This also challenges the clinical trials that used this test. ▪ Definitions and methodologies are essential. The definitions for “fully vaccinated” and “partially vaccinated” wavered during the pandemic and between studies. How authorities determined Covid cases and deaths was never consistent. The tracking of Covid cases was passive and inconsistent between the vaxxed and unvaxxed, and the CDC even admitted to halting their tracking of breakthrough cases. The vaccine registries are also broken, so how can authorities truly determine the effectiveness of the Covid shots with all of these inconsistencies?
▪ Why were doctors, scientists and health care personnel heavily castigated or censored from asking questions or providing their own expertise or concerns with the Covid shots?
▪ Pfizer and Moderna are still releasing tons of data from their clinical trials and even asked for 75 years to do so. Are they trying to hide something?
▪ Why did authorities disallow doctors from using ivermectin and other potential therapies to treat Covid when no other therapies were working? We know the approval of ivermectin and other therapies would’ve prevented the emergency use authorization for the Covid shots. ▪ Why did authorities use mRNA technology to design the Covid shots? This technique to fight coronaviruses in previous clinical studies was never effective, resulting in the death of many animals from antibody dependent enhancement or systemic inflammation.
39
Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease