Abstract: This study examines methodological approaches in investigative journalism and their intersections with scientific research methods, exploring how these frameworks can be employed to enhance the quality of investigative reporting. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the methodological tools used in this field by addressing a central research question: What is the most effective methodology for producing high-quality investigative journalism, and how does it contribute to the development of journalistic practice? Drawing on case studies and practical examples, the study illustrates how scientific methods can be adapted to improve the accuracy and depth of information gathering and analysis in investigative work. It highlights the ways in which research methodologies can guide the investigative process and enrich its outcomes. The study also addresses the key challenges faced by investigative journalists and offers a holistic framework for overcoming these obstacles- ultimately aimed at strengthening the practice of investigative journalism and reinforcing standards of credibility and transparency. Employing a multi- method approach that combines descriptive, analytical and comparative techniques, the study finds significant overlaps between scientific inquiry and investigative journalism, while also identifying essential distinctions between the two fields. These differences, however, do not detract from their shared commitment to producing reliable, evidence-based outcomes. The study concludes that the effectiveness of investigative journalism depends not only on methodological rigour but also on a strong ethical foundation— particularly when engaging with sensitive issues and safeguarding the rights of individuals and communities. Keywords: Scientific Methodology, Investigative Journalism, Journalistic Quality, Professional Ethics.
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter