Sustainability is twofold: education for a sustainable world, equipping students to
address climate change, inequality and structural transformation; and education that sustains individuals over time, providing them with the capabilities to navigate an uncertain and contested world. There is a legitimate concern that the growing emphasis on lifelong learning may become purely instrumental if it is disconnected from purpose and citizenship. For this reason, institutional sustainability requires leadership, governance and coherence across strategy, curriculum and practice. The way forward Within this framework, one can suggest that the universities best positioned to navigate the coming decade will be those that are able to achieve alignment across the following four pillars, without losing their identity. • A distinctive educational offering: Combining general education, disciplinary knowledge and transversal skills • An integrated student experience: Linking curricular and co-curricular activities, making student support part of the core model • A substantive relationship with society: Through the use of projects, applied research, partnerships and real-world learning opportunities • Organisational modernisation: In relation to teaching capacity, institutional analytics, digital infrastructure and operating models capable of sustaining quality at scale This is not an agenda that implements itself. It requires curricular redesign with clear standards, mechanisms to create and close programmes, co‑ordination across units, aligned academic incentives and strategic investment in capabilities. It also requires an institutional policy that guides, rather than prohibits the use of AI, ensuring integrity, developing skills and protecting equity. In addition, internationalisation strategies must evolve beyond mobility for its own sake and towards meaningful academic networks, shared modules, internships and joint degrees that add real value, alongside a focus on “internationalisation at home” that permeates the educational experience. To enable more flexible learning pathways without compromising on quality, meanwhile,
“The growing emphasis on lifelong learning may
requires what might be called an “infrastructure of trust”. This encompasses qualification frameworks, quality assurance systems, transparent standards and mechanisms that make learning pathways legible, portable and comparable. The European discussion on microcredentials is illustrative, both in its desire to expand flexibility and lifelong learning, as well as its insistence on clarity, portability and verifiable standards. The institutional lesson is clear: modularity only creates value when anchored in well‑defined learning outcomes and credible recognition mechanisms. become purely instrumental if it is disconnected from purpose and citizenship”
14 Business Impact • ISSUE 4 • 2026
Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online