Thirdly Edition 7

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 1/3LY

INSOLVENCY L AW V ARBI TRAT ION

Insolvency law contains summary processes for dealing with claims and protections against certain proceedings commencing or continuing. There has been some debate, and recent case law, concerning the primacy of these rules over agreements to arbitrate. In the following article, we look at what the current position is under English law and beyond. GENERAL POSITION UNDER ENGLISH L AW Arbitration agreements, or the authority of validly appointed arbitrators, are not discharged by insolvency. However, when arbitrating with an insolvent entity, theremay be issues of capacity or practical problems with enforcing an award, as well as issues with proceedings being stayed by statute. Office-holders acting in the various forms of insolvency proceeding can generally bring arbitration proceedings under their statutory powers. Issues arise when: (1) the office-holder wishes to commence summary Insolvency Act proceedings contrary to an arbitration clause, or; (2) a creditor attempts to bring or continue arbitration proceedings. In these instances, what happensmay be determined by the insolvency process that has been instigated. Administration An administrator (or administrative receiver) has the powers set out in schedule 1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA86) which include a general power to bring or defend “any action or legal proceedings” and a specific power to refer to arbitration any question affecting the company 1 . In administration scenarios, themoratoriumgranted under para 43(6) of schedule B1 IA86 means that arbitration proceedings, like conventional court proceedings, cannot be brought or continued against the insolvent companywithout either permission from the court or the administrator. The court is only likely to grant permission if: (1) the claimant has a proprietary right to an asset held by the company, or; (2) an arbitral award is needed for the creditor to recover fromelsewhere, e.g. pursuant to insurance or a letter of indemnity (LOI).

BY STEWART PERRY, PARTNER AT CLYDE & CO

Made with FlippingBook Annual report