Back to Table of Contents
should be inclined to recognize the two instincts which became repressed in Hans as familiar components of the sexual libido” (Freud 1909b, p. 140-141). Freud would later introduce the death drive and derive the drive for control from it. But Denis considers that the “death drive” as introduced by Freud is not a drive at all: it has no source, no goal and no energy of its own. In his view, this concept introduces only confusion into the theory. The opposition Eros / Thanatos - one constituting ever larger wholes and the other disuniting them - can, at best, be considered as the two poles of a functioning principle: a principle of organization / disorganization. It is the rise of the unsatisfied - or, for some reason, unsatisfiable - libido that can destroy. In Denis ‘view, behind the scandal Freud evoked by the death drive and the opposition of life versus death is an old myth of all religions, which hides the real scandal of psychoanalysis: it is the libido that can kill, it is the energy that feeds love, that can also destroy. V. Be. Christine Anzieu-Premmereur Christine Anzieu-Premmereur (2015, 2017) is a French analyst working in New York, who in her psychoanalytic work with infants and their parents explores early disturbances in the emerging libidinal organization. Relevant to her work, she explicates Didier Anzieu’s (1979) metaphor of ‘Skin ego’, that combines Bowlby’s and Freud’s thought, in terms of libido and drive theory. In his original synthesis, Anzieu posits a complement to the libidinal theory with its emphasis on satisfaction obtained from an exciting object. This complementary drive, whose origin is expressed in signals received through the quality of touch, holding, the softness and rhythm of contact, originates in early interactions with the body and its surface, the skin. This drive is the starting point of’ ’primary narcissism’ and develops through the double envelope of ‘stimulation-excitement’ and ‘communication’. Anzieu-Premmereur (2017) explores further the infant’s internal world and usefulness of some classical Freudian concepts in helping the analytic work with dyads and triads of parent(s) with their infant. Based on the assumption of the ‘primary narcissism’ as well as on drive theory, she explicates how instinctual needs and the tension associated with them enlist the mother as a part of the process of instinctual gratification and economic balance of the quantities of tension and pleasure in the baby’s primitive internal organization. In this vein, she explores (and clinically exemplifies) the role of libidinization of the body and maternal destructiveness within the early container-contained interaction, using Winnicott’s (1967) and Hoffer’s (1949) pioneering work, and Grotstein’s post-Bionian conceptualizations, in the context of transference in babies, early superego organization, masochistic reactions in helpless infants, body ego, and libidinal cathexis.
184
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online