Back to Table of Contents
specify this interactive aspect for his two-person relational model of free associations (see below). This dimension could also be viewed as close to the notion of reverie of North American Bionian thinkers James Grotstein (1995) and Lawrence Brown (2012). Among the functions of free associations, such as to recall what has been forgotten, to regain lost experiences, to complete mourning, to expand what is condensed, to put thoughts and feelings into words, to elucidate inner conflict, to clarify confusion and to reverse disorientation, Kris stresses the common element - “the promotion of continuity” (Kris 1982, p. 14). As psychoanalysis has demonstrated that components of psychopathology invariably include significant limitations in freedom of associations, Kris “offers a substantial approach to the resolution of psychopathology by focusing upon the limitations and disorders of free associations” (Kris 1982, p. 4). Among other contributions, Kris (1985) developed a notion of the ‘divergent conflict’, analysis of which included the working through of the resistances to mourning of the lost object (one of the two alternatives where there cannot be a compromise). Such working through includes “repeated painful alterations of the associations, expressing longing for one side and the inner need to acknowledge the reality of the loss of the other” (Kris 1985, p. 553). The enduring contribution of Kris remains the use of free associations as the basis of the curative process of psychoanalytic treatment in restoration of psychic continuity. III. Ab. Conceptual Expansion and Expansion of Representational Capacity In part owing to the widening scope of patients treated with analytic therapy, various approaches to an expanding representational and symbolization capacity that are relevant to free associations have emerged. The enlarged purview of free associations included visual images (Kanzer 1958, Warren 1961), nonverbal cues derived from body posture and movements on the couch (McLaughlin 1987, 1992), as well as occasional invitation for the patient to draw something that they found difficult to put into words (Slap 1976, Brakel 1993). Hans Loewald’s (1971,1975) description of language action , where the patient’s words are meant to do something , not communicate something, added another dimension to understanding how patient’s use free association. That is, what he described is how patients use words to attempt to bore, seduce, anger etc. the analyst. Writing on the free associative processes in relation to the transference enactments, Loewald (1975) states: “The unfolding of the transference neurosis as re-enactment proceeds, in a more traditional analysis, by way of the analyst's interpreting interferences with the flow of reporting and associating, and by interpreting certain directions or timings in the drift of associations in terms of transference action… narrative is drawn into the context of transference dramatization, into the force-field of re-enactment. Whether in the form of free association or of more consciously, logically controlled trains of thought, narrative in psychoanalysis is increasingly being revealed in its character as language action, as
380
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online