Back to Table of Contents
memory systems under conditions of acute trauma in adults, several longitudinal studies continued to expand knowledge of the neurobiological consequences of early attachment related experiences (Balbernie, 2001; Siegel, 1998; Schore, 2003) in children with and without early traumatic histories. Detrimental early experiences with consequent neurobiological damage to the extended limbic system, which today includes the orbitofrontal cortex, can cause the child to develop a range of cognitive, emotional and behavioral problems, including impediments of symbolic functioning, vitiating their adolescent and adult adjustment, creating a predisposition to regressive de-symbolization and/or diminishment of symbolic functioning when under stress later in life (Busch 2017). Synaptogenesis and axon myelinization continue in the orbitofrontal cortex well into the second year of life. After this period of peak neuroplasticity of experience-dependent emotional learning, the “working models” of relationships tend to retain their character. However, the orbitofrontal cortex tends to retain a remarkable degree of neuroplasticity throughout life and it is possibly through this pathway that in depth psychoanalytical therapy can have a neurobiological impact (Andreasen, 2001, p. 331). The ongoing discussion over the dynamic nature of first unrepressed implicit imprints has implications for clinical work. One perspective (Clyman, 1991; Fonagy, 1999; Boston Change Process Study Group / BCPSG, 2007) sees the earliest imprints as cognitive procedural encoding of ‘self-with-other’, analogous to riding a bicycle. In these strictly procedural terms, the transference reenactment occurs because some feature of the analytic relationship is sufficiently similar to an already laid down relational working model ‘procedure’, so that priming – an automatic unmotivated process – elicits the procedural relationship pattern. Change can be achieved through ‘moments of meeting’, not necessarily interpretable. Whereas in Shevrin’s dynamic paradigm, unconscious intentions and expectations help determine exactly how and what will be retrieved “[r]etrieval is never simply automatic and unmotivated…” (Shevrin, 2002, p. 137). Shevrin (2002) proposes that ‘procedural memories’, while not repressed and not unconsciously symbolized, are still not inherently automatized, but are rather subject to dynamic-conflictual transferential modifications each time they are retrieved. This view is compatible with dynamic concepts of psychic temporality and Freudian notions of Nachträglichkeit and screen memories. It is also compatible with the broadly defined contemporary Freudian and Object Relations’ approaches to transference enactments, as subsymbolic but ‘symbolizable’ and therefore interpretable (Ellman, 2008). The difference between the two interpretations of the neuroscientific findings seems to be related to the exclusion or inclusion of the dynamic interplay in the inner representational worlds, a hallmark of the psychoanalytic perspective. Ellman (2008 citing Freud, 1915c) notes that the earliest representations are encoded as thing-representations without symbolic value. Although non-symbolized, the thing- presentations can act as basic motivators for complex conflicted responses. Such theorization, together with Shevrin’s (2002) psychoanalytic interpretation of neuroscientific studies of Fabiani, Stadler, Wessels (2000) on ‘veridical memories’, which leave ‘sensory signature’, are consistent with the clinical findings that the earliest, pre-symbolic
920
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online