Government Affairs and Public Relations). The two-day summit consisted of over ten sessions focusing on defining good data, working to uo nn dperri ns tcai np dl e st h, ae ni sdsdueevs e, sl oept tiinngg nperxi ot rsittei epss,. aAg r e e i n g cr ee cnot rganl i tt iaokne at hwaatygfrreoamt e tr hset asnudma mr di itzwa tai os nt haen d ce os snesni stti ea nl ac ny,dbroet qh ul oi rceasl lhyaarne dd rs et as tpeownisdi be ,i lai trye a c r o s s the Judiciary. “ Reliable, consistent data is essential to public trust and confidence in the Judiciary. The Data Excellence Summit advanced a shared commitment across courts and the AOC to strengthen data quality, clarify standards, and to help ensure our reporting accurately reflects the work of Maryland’s courts. ” Dr. Jamie Walter, Research and Analysis Program Director Ap hl saos ei no2f 0i t2s 5d, at thae wJ uadr iechi aoruys el aiunni tciha teidv et .hTehsiesc o n d pf ohuans de af toi counsael swoonr ke nf rhoamn cpi nhga saen do neex, pt ar an nd si nf ogr tmh ien g tf rhiee ns ydsl yt epml aitnf ot or ma mt hoart es us cpapl aobr tl se ,tar annasl yptai crse-n c y, operational efficiency, and evidence-based decision-making across the Maryland Judiciary. A key goal is to enable future fulfillment of data ra edqv ua en sc ti sn gd itrheec tMl ya trhy rl ao nu dg hJ ut dh iec idaartya’ swsat rr ae theogui cs e , pt rrui os tr itthi er so ut og hp rt oi mmeol yt e, aaccccuoruant et aabcicl iet sys atno dp pu ub bl i lci c iJ nu fdoi rcmi a rayt i’ os nc .oTmhmi s i wt moer nk tatlos ou ss ti nr egntgetchhennosl ot hg ey effectively and responsibly by improving
2025 YEAR IN REVIEW Juunddi ec irasrt ya nedmi npgo wo fehr os wc oMu ratruy sl aenr sd ’ws ictohuar tcsl es ae rrevre tphr ee speunbt el i dc . aWt ti thhe tDh ae t ian Ef oxrcme lal et inocne aSnudmdmi si ct uasnsdi o n s tMh ae rdy el avne dl oJpumd iecni at royf cnoenwt i nd ua teas dt oa sdhebvoeal or dp s, ,etxhpea n d , ad na tda i imn porrodveer ut op odne ltihv ee rafcacier,ses fi fbi icliiet yn to, fajnudd iecfifaelc t i v e justice for all. efficiency through secure access to information, me vaoilnvti anign ti ne cghsnt rool onggi cdaalt na eperdost ,eac nt ido ne sn, haadnacpi nt i gn gt ht eo accessibility and quality of court information. S2 e0v2e5r. aTl hn reowu gdha os hu bt ot ha er dyse awr e, trhe ea Dl s aot ai nDt raosdhubcoeadr di n wt i me bessi.tTe hweaMs aacr yc el asns eddJ uadpipcri aorxyi mDaatteal yD8a s, 4h0b0o a r d , lf ar iuenncdhl ye di ni nf o Mr ma ya ,t iporno vaibdoeus t aMc caersysl iabnl ed ,’ su cs oe ru-r t s ap nr odf eh si gs ihol ni gahl st s. Tt hh ee dd aa isl hy beof faorrdt si nocf l Juuddei sc ida ar yt a o n troa tt ae ls ,i na cc ot imv ei nc ga saenl od aoduvt gool ui nmgecsa, saensd, cclaesaer a n c e pf eraotcuersessi ni ng f op remr f oa trimo na nocne sme revai scue rs etsh. aI tt ea nl shoa n c e access to justice, such as interpreting services and Court Help Centers. In October, the Judiciary released the Caseflow Assessment Dashboards fCoorubr ot , t shutphpeocri tricnugi ti mc opurrotvs eadn md ot hnei tDo ri si nt rgi catn d mA dadniat igoenma el l ny,t Roef sceaasrec hp raoncde sAs ni nagl yps ei sr fhoarsm a n c e . developed internal dashboards, including the daily e-filing report dashboard, which became available for internal use in January. These tools are significant because they provide courts and tdhaet ap wu bi tl hi cowu ti tthh er enael -etdi mf oer, ei na ds yi v- ti do u- uanl dr eepr sotrat ns do r custom requests. Ba ny dmcaokuirntgs ienrfvoi rcme sapt iuobnl iocnl ycaavsaei lparbol cee, st hs ien g
19
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs