Attachment Styles and Spiritual Maturity: The Role of Secur…

Attachment and Spiritual Maturity 21

parent and child relationships may all have an attachment component, but not all have the

foundational secure base which forms the enduring affectional bonds or 'attachment'.

The affectional bond is the control system that is sensitive to the availability of

the attachment figure and triggers attachment behavior. If the attachment figure is close

enough, the system is calm; but if the range of proximity is exceeded, the person

experiences a threat to the relationship and separation anxiety arises. This separation

anxiety triggers behaviors designed to foster a reconnection to the attachment figure and a

felt sense of security (Pistole, 1994).

The role ofthe attachment figure then is to provide a secure base of support and

to offer assistance as needed without interfering with or limiting the independent

explorations of the child. The ability to depend on someone in times of stress is viewed

as an adaptive human quality developed through the role of affect.

The Development of a Working Model of Attachment

In order for dyadic patterns to become self-regulating, the infant must develop

both a working model ofcaregiver response and appropriate strategies for regulating

attachment behavior (Kobak, Cole, Holland, Ferenz-Gillies, & Fleming, 1993). The

research design of Ainsworth's Baltimore study comprised a 20 minute sequence in which

the young child was exposed to an unfamiliar place, an unfamiliar person, parental

separation, and the experience of being alone. Children's attachment styles were

categorized as 'secure', 'anxious/ambivalent', and 'avoidant' depending on the quality of

reunion behavior illustrated how infant strategies for regulating attachment behavior in the

Strange Situation are linked to differential patterns of caregiver response in the home

(Ainsworth, Biehar, Walter, & Wal, 1978). Ainsworth recognized in her development of

the Strange Situation that the security or insecurity of an attachment relationship

constituted a crucial aspect of individual differences in relationships (Ainsworth et al.

1978). This approach has become the standard form ofmeasurement in attachment

research (Rutter, 1995).

Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker