3 of 7
• Despite the fact there was never “therapeutic visitation” or contact/participation of any kind by my sons and I, Judge Green tried to legitimize Ms. Reinhold’s testimony by affirming:
“Since as early as June 2023, Mother failed to appear for any hearings and ultimately chose to no longer participate in any of the court proceedings, although she did attend the therapeutic visits.” ( see judgment, page 5, #43 )
• Nothing in the court record remotely suggests that I was to be the subject of a psychological evaluation or clinical assessment by Ms. Reinhold. Her fabricated assessment and diagnoses of me, and the impact she claimed those diagnoses have on my sons, were the foundation upon which she supported her testimony. The fraudulent judgment entered by Judge Green on January 13, 2025, seven months after the trial he claims took place, affirmed that Ms. Reinhold testified:
“In her opinion, the children were severely alienated from Father because of the “obsessed alienation” and “parental alienation” of Mother. That because of these diagnoses, the boys should be separated from their mother for a minimum of 100 days. That such separation would include the oldest child be restricted from driving and both children be restricted from any ability to electronically communicate with anyone so they would have absolutely no opportunity to contact their mother for 100 days.” ( see judgment, page 11, #1 )
5. MO Law and Court Rules Govern Orders For Mental Health Evaluations
Missouri Court Rule 60.01 establishes strict requirements for a mental health evaluation for the purposes of litigation. It requires a motion, notice, order and consent -
•
Made with FlippingBook - PDF hosting