5 of 7
✓ A February 2020 Missouri Appellate Court Opinion affirming the judgment for the Full Order of Protection ( see Feb. 2020 Appellate Opinion ) ✓ A November 2020 Judgment with Findings of Fact of Mr. Ojeda’s ongoing contempt of the court’s orders, and a consent renewal of the existing Full OP ( see Nov. 2020 judgment and OP renewal and pages 6-7 of Ojeda Evidence ) ✓ A March 2022 judgment dismissing Mr. Ojeda’s Motion for The Appointment of a Successor Supervisor (Karen Warren-Strong) and Motion to Modify Custody. ( see March 2022 Judgment and page 10 of Ojeda Evidence ) ✓ An April 2022 judgment dismissing Mr. Ojeda’s Motion to Vacate the judgment entered in March 2022. In that motion, Mr. Ojeda’s attorney affirmed that the cause for his loss of contact with the minors, including supervised visitation, was the “result of The Court’s orders and judgments” ( see page 1 of dismissed motion and record of dismissal ) • Despite that extensive record which precedes the case file created by Judge Green, Ms. Reinhold testified to alternate material facts that complemented those being misrepresented by Judge Green as well, including: ✓ “… the children were severely alienated from Father because of the “obsessed alienation” and “parental alienation” of Mother.” ( see judgment, page 11, #1 ) ✓ “… the children’s reasonings for not wanting to see their Father were unreasonable and had no rational basis, but are merely a reiteration of their Mother’s irrational beliefs..” ( see judgment, page 11, #2 ) ✓ “… in the future the boys may suffer in their personal relationships with others and may isolate themselves..” ( see judgment, page 12, #3 ) ✓ “Both mother and father have mental health issues. Their behavior towards one another is not indicative of mature healthy adults.” ( see judgment, page 12, #4 (6) )
Made with FlippingBook - PDF hosting