governance MO Statutes have over marital property division is not discretionary, but he continued to deprive me of my ability to engage The Law. He continued to create the need for protracted litigation by suggesting a need for additional legal processes which were unnecessary to the issue being presented, which was a failure to state a legal claim by R.V. and his counsel. The Court can’t enter something that isn’t legal- the law would supersede it (transcript of hearing, pg. 13 lines 1-41 and pg. 18, lines 7-19). • At the end of the 4-19-23 hearing, Judge Green told the parties that he knew that I “wanted to get away from him” (transcript of hearing, pg. 17 lines 28-32) and the parties were then presented an order which they signed consenting for the case to be reassigned to another judge’s division to have the marital property identified/divided. June 3-8th 2022 • After not receiving any kind of notice regarding whether the case had been reassigned to one of the other divisions The Parties consented to at the end of the hearing on 4/19/22, I followed up with Judge Jason D. Dodson’s Division by emailing his clerk, April Moore, who I previously corresponded with regarding the motion I filed for Judge Green’s Disqualifica- tion for Cause. In the email, I included a link to the audio of the hearing held on-record on April 19, 2022 in Judge Green’s Division after Judge Dodson refused to allow me to set a hearing date for The Motion to Disqualify Judge Green For Cause. I let Ms. Moore know that there was still a need for Judge Dodson to hold a hearing because the issues were persisting, and I didn’t even have access to the case file. I did not receive further correspondence from Ms. Moore following the last email in that exchange. June 14, 2022 • As evidenced by my correspondence the week prior with the clerk of the judge who was supposed to reassign the case to another division, Judge Dodson (Div. 10), the case re- mained unassigned, so further movement in the litigation was on hold. • I emailed Attorney Jack Cavanagh to see if Mr. Voytas was willing to settle the outstanding litigation by agreeing to terms of a Marital Property Settlement Agreement, which would reflect the date the marital home would be listed and how the proceeds would be divided. We still hadn’t even identified The Parties’ martial liabilities and assets (see hearing 10/19/21) and Mr. Voytas was getting remarried in just a few weeks at this time. • I never received a reply from Mr. Cavanagh. The next time Mr. Cavanagh contacted me was at the end of August 2022, a few weeks after Mr. Voytas’s destination wedding in July 2022. At that time, Mr. Cavanagh’s O ffi ce provided me a copy of a motion they filed in a newly-assigned court division which claimed I was in breach of the post-nuptial agreement (reference 8/23/24). July 2022 • There was no correspondence from The Opposing Party, or The Court, during this month. Mr. Voytas was remarried by the end of the month. He was able to proceed with remar- riage, and fund a destination wedding among other things, even though The Court had not even identified his marital liabilities and assets with me (see 10/19/21 hearing), nor entered a plan for their future division. Mr. Voytas was forming financial entanglements with a new spouse while I could not be recognized by financial institutions to establish new
11
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online