a settlement conference. Later, in Judge Green’s Division on 10/19/22, both Mr. Cavanagh and Judge Green acted as though a settlement conference had taken place. During the hearing on 10/19/22, when I started to speak about the fact that my former attorney and I were the only ones to show up for that conference because Mr. Cavanagh was a no-call/ no-show, Judge Green quickly cut me o ff (see 10/19/21 transcript, pg. 13). He then warned me about how if I brought up what was said in a settlement conference again, it would be contemptuous, but there never was a settlement conference . This was even noted in the letter my former attorney, Susan Jacobson, filed in Judge Green’s Division to document that all parties were on the same page about the state of the case. • I still didn’t have access to the active case file, and wasn’t receiving notifications if some- thing was entered in it- aside from what Mr. Cavanagh’s O ffi ce would email me, but I was unable to view what was being entered in The Court Docket. Therefore, I had no way of knowing if it reflected what was actually happening in the case in real-time. My inabil- ity to access the active case file, among other obstructions to my right to The Due Process of Law, had remained unresolved for over a year at this point. The last time The Parties had a hearing in Judge Green’s Division, before agreeing the case could be reassigned, was on April 19, 2022. During that hearing I told Judge Green I still didn’t have access to the active case file, and wasn’t being notified of entries in The Court’s Docket. Those is- sues with access were reported yet again to The Head of Family Court’s Division, but noth- ing was done and I was not notified when the case was assigned to her division in June 2022. • I appropriately reported those outstanding issues related to the obstruction of my Right to Due Process in motions filled in The Presiding Judge of The St. Louis Judicial Circuit’s Divi- sion, Judge Mary E. Ott. I included audio with certified transcripts, to demonstrate exactly how The Opposing Party and Judge Green were misrepresenting what was filed in the case, or what proceedings had taken place, more than once , to Administrative Divisions within The St. Louis County Judicial Circuit. However, The Presiding Judge of The Judicial Circuit, Judge Mary Ott, concealed what I had reported to her in her judgement (refer- ence events listed under 10/11/22 and 10/18/22). • Refer to when the case was reassigned to Judge Mondonna Ghasedi (Div. 43) without my knowledge, and she transferred it back to Judge Green’s Division. In Judge Ghasedi’s 8/24/22 order, she cited that Mr. Cavanagh filed a motion in her division on 8/23/22 that in- dicated The Parties had outstanding issues to resolve before proceeding with a trial. That was the last motion filed by The Opposing Party at this time, and The Parties had not met with Judge Green since Judge Ghasedi entered her order transferring it back to his division on 8/24/22. • The only reason the case was transferred back to Judge Green’s Division was because The Parties still had outstanding pre-trial issues which were evidenced by Mr. Cavanagh’s mo- tion filed on 08/24/23. This motion suggested The Parties were divorced and The Court had already identified and divided The Property and that I was in contempt of those orders.
18
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online