Chronology of Divorce From Attorney Rick Voytas

concealed that those issues had even been reported to her which was why I filed an Emergency Motion For Relief From Judgement or Order In Accordance With Missouri Rule 74.06 in her division and a corresponding Emergency Motion For Continuance in Judge Green’s Divi- sion (see events listed under 01/13/23). • In the certified transcript of the proceedings held in Division 36 on 01/17/23, Judge Green asked about whether The Parties wanted to give a Real Estate Commissioner the power to determine the sales price of the home. On page 82, lines 4-9, it is evident that I was not consenting to a partial judgement which orders a Real Estate Commissioner to pro- ceed in advance because my response to him was: “You know, it's -- so much depends on knowing what comes out of this judgment.” • I couldn’t decide what the minimum amount I could a ff ord to sell my primary residence was without knowing what Judge Green entered in a final judgement identifying what The Parties’ liabilities and assets were and how The Court divided them upon divorce. I couldn’t determine what my financial situation was or what amount of money I had to relocate with my sons, who I am the sole custodian and provider for, in order to establish a new primary residence. January 25, 2023 • I was copied on an email that Attorney Jack Cavanagh sent to Judge Green which had at- tached to it a Motion to Correct and Amend Order and Judgement Regarding Commission- er’s Powers. The motion referred to a judgement that Mr. Cavanagh stated in the pleadings was entered on 01/23/23 regarding The Powers of The Real Estate Commissioner. • I had no idea what “order and judgement” Mr. Cavanagh’s motion was referring to because The Parties were not in Judge Green’s Division on 01/23/23, nor had they had a hearing regarding proceeding with a sale of the home in advance of The Court identifying and dividing The Parties martial assets and liabilities. It was unclear how this judgement came to be when The Parties didn’t have a judgement which identified what The Parties’ martial liabilities and assets even were yet, however the judgement was being presented as if it had been entered with the consent of The Parties. • I “replied all” to Mr. Cavanagh’s email and addressed Judge Green directly in my response. I stated in my email that if an order and judgement had been entered on 01/23/23 as Mr. Cavanagh’s Motion suggested, I was not in receipt of it. Neither Judge Green or Mr. Cavanagh ever responded. January 26, 2023 • I sent Mr. Cavanagh another email and copied his paralegal’s email address as well, to as- sert again that I was not in receipt of the order and judgement he referred to in his Motion to Amend that he emailed to Judge Green and I the day prior. • Mr. Cavanagh’s paralegal responded by email and attached the judgement Mr. Cavanagh was referring to in his Motion to Amend as being entered by The Court on 01/23/23. • The Order and Judgement Regarding Commissioner’s Powers attached to that email was materially fraudulent. It stated that The Parties entered into a consent judgment to sell

22

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online