Chronology of Divorce From Attorney Rick Voytas

the marital home in advance of The Court entering a judgement identifying and dividing The Parties’ marital liabilities and assets, including The Parties’ equity in the marital home. • The judgement, which was unsigned by either of the parties, assigned a list of extraordinary powers to Real Estate Commissioner, Attorney Bob Hamilton. It stated that we agreed that Mr. Hamilton could evict either of The Parties for non-compliance, which didn’t make sense as Mr. Voytas had already purchased a new primary residence, since he is a high net-worth individual who can make large all-cash purchases of real estate. • The only people living in the home at that time were my teenage sons and I so a threat of eviction, from our co-titled former marital home, would only impact us. I re- quired financing that I could not obtain without a Marital Property Settlement Agreement, which was one of the primary issues in the case, aside from the ongoing obstruction of my Due Process Rights, which was evident even in how I came to find out a judgement had even been entered by Judge Green on 01/23/23 (see events listed under 01/25/23). • This served to create a scenario in which Mr. Voytas could have us “evicted” by sighting my contempt of a judgement that he and the perpetrators could say that I consented to, when they knew that I did not consent, nor would I have which is why they had to proceed via fraud. • I was not asked to verbally consent to a partial judgement with these terms in Judge Green’s Division on 01/17/23 , let alone sign one, and yet Judge Green entered it anyway claiming the judgement was entered into by consent on 01/23/23 (see events listed under 01/17/23) . • I did not verbally consent to proceeding with the sale of the home in advance of The Court’s identification and division of The Parties’ marital liabilities and assets, nor did I sign a consent order or judgement when Judge Green dismissed The Parties from his division on 01-17-23. Judge Green entered it anyway claiming the judgement was en- tered into by consent on 01/23/23 (see events listed under 01/17/23) . • This was not an outcome I could have predicted (see events under 01/17/23) given the fact we were supposed to be identifying and dividing the property so a final judgement, known as a Martial Property Settlement Agreement could be entered, not holding a hear- ing about selling The Parties’ Property in advance of even identifying it. • Based on the motion filed by Mr. Cavanagh on Mr. Voytas’s behalf on 08/23/22, which was the cause of the case being transferred back to Judge Green’s Division on 08/24/22, they wanted The Court to proceed with “evicting” my sons and I because they claimed I was in “breach of contract”. They were trying to achieve the same thing, only make it look like I consented to it since Missouri Law didn’t provide for it based on the fact The Court still hadn’t identified and divided The Parties’ marital liabilities and assets. January 30, 2023 • Mr. Cavanagh and I received an email from Attorney Bob Hamilton’s O ffi ce with a letter at- tached from Mr. Hamilton. • I called Mr. Hamilton’s O ffi ce to request an in-person meeting to unwind the fact that the judgement entered by Judge Green on 01/23/23 claiming to be by consent of The Par-

23

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online