March 21, 2023 • Bob Hamilton’s assistant emailed The Parties a formal letter he wrote explaining why he filed a motion suggesting that the issue with proceeding with the home sale was anything other than the fact that there was not a consent judgement to proceed with selling it in advance of The Court identifying and dividing The Parties’ liabilities and assets with a Marital Property Settlement Agreement. He mentioned the pending Motions to Dis- qualify Judge Green For Cause which stilll needed to be ruled on by The Presiding Judge of The St. Louis County Judicial Circuit, Judge Mary E. Ott, but asserted that those should not interfere with proceeding with the sale. • Despite Mr. Hamilton acknowledging the problem with access to the case file and the fact there was not a consent judgement agreed upon by The Parties (see 2-16-23 audio/tran- script), he attempted to give the appearance that I was simply being di ffi cult and non-com- pliant. This paved the way for Judge Green to later create additional orders based upon the pleadings of an attorney who was supposed to be serving as a third-party neutral, but in reality was lying that I was non-compliant with a judgement he knew simply did not exist. Links Email sent to parties by Bob Hamilton’s Assistant Letter Attached to Email from Bob Hamilton Bob Hamilton's Motion which in itself indicates there was not a consent judgement entered into by The Parties requesting the home be sold prior to The Court identifying and dividing liabilities and assets in a Marital Property Settlement Agreement. That is the reason why he was asking The Court to enter orders providing him with the authority to proceed, only based on the fraudulent pretense that I was violating a judgement which I consented to, when I did not. Corresponding Notice of Hearing which Bob filed despite knowing that I had pending Motions to Disqualify Judge Green For Cause , had been provided a copy of the pending motions which indicated there was ongoing obstruction of my Due Process Rights, and other issues which he himself previously acknowledged during our first meeting (see 2-16-23 audio/transcript of first meeting). April 24, 2023 • I received an email from Bob Hamilton which forwarded an email he received from Mr. Ca- vanagh on this same day, which had attached to it a judgement from the “hearing” held in Judge Ott’s Division on 02/22/23 for my Emergency Motion For Relief From Judgement Or Order In Accordance With Missouri Rule 74.06. • This was a total shock to me given the fact that Judge Ott told Mr. Cavanagh, Mr. Hamilton, and I, during what was supposed to be a hearing for my motion, that she would not be hearing the motion that day because she first needed to determine if she was “procedurally postured” to hear it, and would get back to The Parties once she determined how to proceed ( see 02/22/23 transcript ).
28
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online