• In Ms. Albin’s email, she notified me that there was a hearing date set for The Opposing Parties’ Motion To Enter Post-Nuptial Agreement as Judgement on 04/19/22, which is the motion I emailed her about on March 11, 2022. I never received a response as to whether we needed to refile the Counter-Motion objecting to the same pleadings that I filed in De- cember 2021 after they filed the same pleadings in November 2021. There had not been a hearing for those outstanding motions since the time of the 02/09/22 settlement conference with Judge Green, which left those motions unresolved by consent of The Parties. • The technique for advancing the crime Ms. Albin engaged in was repetitively gas-lighting me by suggesting that I was asking something of The Court that Missouri Law doesn’t require of it anyway, and was somehow being unreasonable. She would then use these claims to support why she would not represent me if I would not waive my right to protections provided by the terms within The Post-Nuptial Agreement, which provided for me to determine the date of sale at the time a divorce petition was filed and the marital liabilities and assets divided. Ms. Albin was aware this would prevent my sons’ and I from being able to establish a new home that I could a ff ord to maintain post-divorce as a sole custodian and sole financial provider, and leave unresolved legal matters with someone who was months away from getting married again. • I emailed Ms. Albin a link to the audio from the only other meeting between The Parties and Judge Green in the case, which was held on 10/19/21, during which Judge Green and Mr. Cavanagh pretended there had been a settlement conference, and that my former at- torney hadn’t filed counter-pleadings, when it was clear that she had. In addition, it indicated that the property still had not even been identified by The Court because the op- posing party had not provided the information required to do so. I was requesting her to file a Motion to Disqualify For Cause which would need to be filed in The Division of The Presiding Judge of The Judicial Circuit, Judge Mary E. Ott (Div. 7). March 18, 2022 • There was an email exchange between Ms. Albin and I regarding my request for her to file a Motion to Disqualify Judge Green for Cause on my behalf. The last message in the email thread was sent by me and I did not receive any further contact from Ms. Albin or her o ffi ce, until an email correspondence I received from her paralegal on 03/30/22. March 30, 2022 • Cynthia Albin’s paralegal emailed me a copy of a letter, Motion to Withdraw, and Notice of Hearing filed by Ms. Albin. Her Notice of Hearing requested a 04/11/22 date which was exactly seven business-days from the time she was notifying me of it. She did not even co- ordinate a date or time that I could be available. That date was also just a week away from the hearing Jack Cavanagh had set for April 19, 2022 for their Motion to Enter Post-Nuptial Agreement as Judgement. • Ms. Albin knew that I requested that she, at minimum, notify The Presiding Judge of The St. Louis County Judicial Circuit, Judge Mary E. Ott, that she refused to file a Motion to Dis- qualify Judge Green for Cause on my behalf, and was requesting to withdrawal from my case as a result of that disagreement. This would allow The Presiding Judge, who hears motions related to judicial misconduct of other judges practicing in The Judicial Circuit, to be aware there was an immediate issue significant enough to result in Ms. Albin’s with- drawal.
8
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online