13
b. Judge Ott was made aware at the end of the hearing in her division on 10/11/22 , that Judge Green had begun scheduling dates in his division for a second matter, filed by Mr. Ojeda in June 2022 and assigned to Judge Green in August 2024. c. Judge Green scheduled the first case conference for the second legal matter assigned to him, filed by Mr. Ojeda, to take place less than 24 hours after the hearing we were having regarding his Disqualification for Cause in my divorce from Mr. Voytas on 10/11/22. 57) 10/12/22 - Mr. Ojeda’s Attorney, Roseanne Horan and Judge Green proceeded with a first case conference related to the Motion to Modify Custody that Ms. Horan filed in June 2022, that was assigned to Judge Green’s Division by the same Administrative Judge, Judge Dodson, who was aware of the oustanding issues related to Judge Green’s appointment to another open case. a. Ms. Horan and Judge Green were aware they scheduled this initial case conference to take place less than 24 hours after The Presiding Judge of The Courts, Judge Ott, was holding a hearing regarding Judge Green’s disqualification in my divorce from Rick Voytas, to which he was already assigned. b. Judge Green and Ms. Horan knew I was not available for a conference on this day in advance, and Judge Green’s Division would not acknowledge the formal motion I filed in his division which alerted The Court to the conflicts, despite it being confirmed filed with The Court by The Domestic Relations Department. 58) 10/13/22 - I emailed Judge Ott’s Clerk, Carol Turner, to let her know that I had not received a judgement from Judge Ott’s hearing regarding Judge Green’s Disqualification For Cause in my divorce from my second husband. I told her that I was concerned because Judge Green was proceeding in a second case. 59) 10/18/22 - I received a judgement via mail from Jude Ott’s Division, for my Motion to Disqualify Judge Green For Cause in my divorce from Attorney Rick Voytas. I did not know a judgement had been entered until this time, despite contacting Judge Ott’s Division on 10-13-22 . a. The judgement summarized a legal argument and evidence, which the transcript from the hearing on 10/11/22 reveals is not what occurred in Judge Ott’s Division that day. This is particularly evident on pages 19-20 of the transcript when Judge Ott clarifies my argument, when compared to what she states it was in her judgement . The discrepancy is evident in reviewing the certified hearing transcript and exhibits filed, juxtaposed to the judgement
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator