14
entered.
b. Judge Ott’s judgement claimed that my argument for Judge Green’s Disqualification For Cause was precisely what she clarified on-record that it was not. Based on Judge Ott’s judgement, no one would even know that I accused Judge Green of obstructing my Fourteenth Amendment Rights and covering it up with a fraudulent case record. c. Judge Ott engaged in the same crime that I brought to her attention in her role as The Presiding Judge of The St. Louis County Judicial Circuit. In her judgement, Judge Ott described a set of materially fraudulent facts that would allow her to apply the law in a way that would result in the outcome that her colleague, and the attorneys involved in the crime, needed. (see RSMo570.095 and 18 U.S.C., Section 241 ). d. In response, I later filed an Emergency Motion for Relief From Judgement or Order In Accordance With MO Procedural Rule 74.06 , along with the corresponding exhibits , in Judge Ott’s Division on 01/13/22. According to MO Procedural Rule 74.06 , this motion can be granted by The Court at any time upon a motion being filed, or by The Court’s own initiation, to remedy an order, judgement, or other part of a court record, that is not accurate due to clerical error, oversight, irregularities, the absence of due process which would render a judgement “void”, or intentional fraud. 60) 12/22/22 - Mr. Ojeda’s Attorney, Roseanne Horan filed a notice for a telephone settlement conference to be held with Judge Green’s Division for Mr. Ojeda’s outstanding Motion to Modify Custody on 01/03/23 at 9am. 61) 01/03/23 - In accordance with the instructions included with Attorney Roseanne Horan’s settlement conference notice , I waited for Ms. Horan to initiate a call. When Ms. Horan had not initiated a call as of 08:59am, per The Division’s order, I called the listed phone line. I called at 8:59am, 9:01am, 9:03am, 9:05am, 9:09am, 9:14am, and 9:35am per my mobile phone record . The Division’s phone line just continued to ring with no answer each time. a. Judge Green’s Division’s website page stated at this time , “Division 36 preference is to conduct Status Conferences (previously referred to as “Settlement Conferences”) by phone. Be sure to review Division 36 Phone Conference Order which can be found on this webpage. If the attorneys and/or parties prefer an “in person” conference they shall designate such preference on written notice.”. b. At 4:24pm, Ms. Horan emailed me to let me know what “orders” had been entered at the “settlement conference” that day, even though there was not
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator