15
one held at the scheduled time included in the court notice filed by Ms. Horan on 12/22/22 . At 9pm that evening I received an email notification from The Court’s online case tracker which indicated that Ms. Horan and Judge Green “corrected” her notice for a phone settlement conference at 9am on 01/03/23, to instead reflect that a hearing was held. c. The Court’s online case tracker indicated that Ms. Horan’s notice for a phone settlement conference was altered on 01/03/23 at 12:30pm, which was over three hours AFTER the time that the 9am phone settlement conference was noticed to be held on 01/03/23. d. I was not provided notice of a hearing, nor could I have when Attorney Roseanne Horan’s Notice was altered three hours after the time of the phone conference, which did not occur. These changes were made on the same day that the phone conference was previously noticed for, and after the time that the original notice stated, so there could not have been notice given since the notice itself was altered AFTER THE TIME OF THE EVENT. e. A hearing could not have been held because the opposing party (me) did not receive notice of it. There was not a hearing held on 01/03/23 if both parties didn’t receive notice so that they could respond, be present and engage in due process of law. The only thing that could have taken place on 01/03/23 was a phone settlement conference at 9am, as was previously noticed by Attorney Roseanne Horan, but it did not (see 01/03/23). f. Judge Green and the attorneys involved in the two cases assigned to him, were intentionally obstructing my Fourteenth Amendment Rights, and covering up the evidence of their crime, through the fraudulent court records they were creating. g. This same pattern of criminal misconduct and fraud was already thoroughly documented in my divorce from Attorney Rick Voytas (full chronology of that case found here ). However The Presiding Judge of St. Louis County Courts, Judge Mary Ott, engaged in the same type of fraud as Judge Green was committing, when she entered her judgement for his Disqualification For Cause in my divorce from Attorney Rick Voytas. h. Judge Green’s 01/03/23 orders stated that he was “reminding” The Parties that there was an order for Karen Warren-Strong to be holding supervised visits with Mr. Ojeda, when there was not. In his “reminder order” Judge Green preemptively threatened that if I did not comply with it, I could face sanctions by The Court. i. In addition, Judge Green appointed Attorney Cynthia Albin to serve as a Guardian ad Litem (GAL) but she recused herself two weeks later. Ms. Albin
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator