2
5) 04/05/17 - There was hearing regarding the renewal of the 03/30/17 TRO suspending Mr. Ojeda’s custody and visitation with the minors. a. A TRO for a minor from a parent requires renewal by The Court every seven days until it is dismissed or dissolved by other orders of The Court. b. The TRO was renewed and The Court appointed a Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) for the minors (Attorney Je ff Medler). 6) 04/12/17 - The Parties, along with the court-appointed GAL Je ff Medler, submitted a consent judgement to The Court dissolving the oustanding TRO against Mr. Ojeda, which would otherwise require renewal every seven days while the corresponding Modification of Custody proceeded. The judgement called for Mr. Ojeda to resume his custody and visitation with our youngest son only, while his custody and visitation with our older son would remain suspended and per the orders of The Court- Appointed GAL while a Modification of Custody proceeded. 7) 05/03/17 - A settlement conference was held for the ongoing Modification of Custody corresponding to the suspension of Mr. Ojeda’s custody and visitation, in a new court division (Judge Mary Schroeder) following the former judge’s retirement (Judge Beach). An order was entered a ffi rming that our oldest son’s custody and visitation with Mr. Ojeda remained suspended and per the directives of the GAL since 03/30/17. 8) 05/15/17 - My attorney filed a Motion for Psychological Evaluation of Respondent which requested that The Court order a psychological evaluation of Mr. Ojeda (see 05/17/17 for hearing). 9) 05/16/17 - My attorney filed a TRO and Preliminary Injuction with Notice , for my youngest son whose custody and visitation with Mr. Ojeda resumed six weeks prior (see 04/12/17). His older brother’s custody and visitation with Mr. Ojeda remained suspended and pending recommendations of the GAL appointed to resolve Mr. Ojeda’s custody and visitation suspension which began on 03/30/17. The Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction filed on my youngest son’s behalf was supported by evidence attested to The Court by the GAL, as well as an a ffi davit filed by the children’s therapist Julie-Walther Scheibel. 10) 05/17/17 - Following a hearing, The Court granted the TRO and Preliminary Injunction with Notice for my younger son. The Court’s Judgement states that the TRO was “granted in part and denied in part”. This was due to the fact that if The Court granted only a TRO for my younger son, it would require a renewal by hearing every seven days. Instead The Court found su ffi cient evidence to suspend Mr. Ojeda’s custody and visitation of our younger son, as was already the case for
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator