Chronology of Ojeda Case

23

Settlement Agreement required for me to secure new housing for us. They began depleting the only financial support my two teenage sons have to rely on, due to the fact that I am their sole provider, by garnishing my wages for attorneys’ fees when I was owed tens and thousands of legal fees by Mr. Ojeda since 2018. In addition, I was reporting that his bankruptcy applications were perjured to The U.S. Attorney’s O ffi ce for the Eastern District of Missouri. g. Following what took place in Judge Green’s Division on 05/23/23 in case with Mr. Ojeda , and 05/25/23 in the case with Mr. Voytas , all I could do was continue to report these St. Louis County Legal Professionals’ crime and publicly post the evidence, given the level of public corruption involved. 70) 07/23/23 - I received a call from Detective Katie Exline of The St. Louis County Police Department. She said she was at my home with a woman named Karen Strong who said she was supposed to be picking my 13 and 16 year old sons up to take them to Mr. Ojeda for a visit. My sons and I were out of town at that time on a road trip, during which my 16 year-old son drove his own vehicle, as we were about to be “evicted” from the home I owned with my second husband, Rick Voytas, because Judge Green was pretending I signed a consent judgment which simply did not exist. a. I never had any contact with Karen Strong, and per Mr. Ojeda’s allegations in a previous Contempt Motion , I had not complied with Ms. Strong’s email request for “intake information”. It was unclear how Ms. Strong got my home address or why she showed up to my property looking around and peering through windows with a police o ffi cer on Sunday 07/23/23. b. According to Ms. Strong’s past emails, which I did not respond to, she had to get information by Thursday to hold a Sunday Visit. Therefore Ms. Strong knew by Thursday 07/20/23 that I had no intention of engaging with her, let alone providing her information about where my sons’ and I lived, so there was not going to be a visit on 07/23/23. Yet she compelled a St. Louis County Police Detective to come with her to an address of someone’s home that had not even provided her their address, and declined to respond to her request for that information. c. There was a November 2020 Contempt Judgement stating that Mr. Ojeda’s attempt to use Karen Strong to supervise was contemptuous, and a March 2022 Judgement stating that she would not be appointed as a Successor Supervisor at a time when The Court knew that Mr. Ojeda had not had supervised visits since May 2021 and why, and a dismissal of Mr. Ojeda’s Attorney’s Motion to Vacate the judgement denying Karen Strong’s appointment. d. On 01/03/23, Judge Green entered an “order” when there was not a legal

Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator