Comparative Analysis of Stem Cells (MSCs) and MUSE Cells

MSCs vs. MUSE Cells at a Glance

Category

MSCs (Mesenchymal Stem Cells)

MSCs (Mesenchymal Stem Cells)

Discovery

1960s–1970s, extensively studied

2010, relatively new discovery

Placenta, Wharton’s jelly, adipose, endometrium, dental pulp (abundant, scalable) Isolated directly, no reprogramming required Decades of global use; tens of thousands of patients; strong safety data 80,000+ papers, 1,500+ clinical trials

Rare subpopulation of MSCs (~1–3%)

Source

Enriched via stress-based selection methods

Preparation

Preclinical and early human trials suggest non-tumorigenic, but limited patient data

Safety Profile

<600 papers, <10 clinical trials

Evidence Base

Multiple approved products worldwide (e.g., Japan, South Korea)

Regulatory Use

No regulatory approvals to date

Arthritis, orthopedic repair, autoimmune, systemic inflammation, anti-aging Readily available, consistent, scalable

Stroke, heart attack, ALS, spinal cord injury (early-stage)

Clinical Focus

Rare, costly to manufacture, low yield

Practicality

Safe, proven, and effective for broad patient needs

Promising but experimental; not yet ready for routine use

Status Today

Longevity Medical Institute (C) Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

09

Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Creator