Option 5v2
1,874,000
$727,000
$1,054,000
93,000
Option 6
1,928,000
$781,000
$1,054,000
93,000
It is important to understand the distinction between the cost categories. "Costs avoided directly by Reorganization" savings are tied directly to reductions that are a clear consequence of reorganization (e.g., administrative positions in a closed school). "Avoided budget costs made available through Reorganization" savings, which include classroom teachers, are subject to the final discretion of the school committee during the budget process. The financial analysis shows that Options 3v2, 4, and 5v2 all yield identical total annual savings of 1,874,000**. Option 6 yields a slightly higher saving of **1,928,000 , a difference driven entirely by the net savings from its unique administrative restructuring. An important caveat to the additional perceived savings of Option 6 is that Principal salaries of the two large elementary schools will likely need to be adjusted based on increased responsibilities and school size. This would likely reduce savings to a level that makes all options yield similar savings. 4.0 Conclusion and Next Steps The reorganization options presented in this summary offer a viable path toward achieving longer-term significant and necessary cost savings for the district. These savings are primarily realized through reductions in staffing—both administrative and instructional—and are directly linked to an increase in average class sizes. The information detailed here is based on extensive modeling and is intended to serve as a clear basis for robust community discussion. It is a model for consideration, not a final budget proposal. The ultimate determination of class sizes, staffing levels, and resource allocations will be made by the school committee through the annual budget process, informed by feedback from all stakeholders.
Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software